MLB’s Soft Cap Is Becoming More Rigid

One of the changes to the most recent edition of the collective bargaining agreement between owners and players was the addition of a surcharge — a fancy way of referring to a second tax — to be levied upon those teams whose payrolls exceed the tax threshold by a certain amount. Specifically, teams that exceed the $197 million mark by $20-$40 million this season will be assessed a 12% surcharge. Clubs exceeding the threshold by $40 million or more, meanwhile, receive a 42.5% to 45.0% surcharge, depending upon whether a club is a multi-year taxpayer.

The surcharges occur on top of the luxury tax: 20% for a first-time payer, 30% for a second-time payer, and 50% for a third-time or greater offender.

Baseball essentially instituted a “soft” salary cap with the addition of the luxury tax, a vehicle adopted to curb spending at the top end of team payrolls, to protect owners from themselves. However, as I determined just before the Winter Meetings, that cap is becoming less soft and more rigid.

Baseball’s salary tax more and more resembles the NBA’s soft cap.

With the addition of more severe penalties for breaching the cap and with clubs perhaps also wanting to reset their tax clocks to avoid a multi-year violation before the arrival next offseason’s historic free agency class, the luxury-tax barrier has become more and more a defined line that teams are reluctant to cross.

This offseason, for instance, we’ve already seen the Yankees dump Chase Headley’s contract, opting to part with a young, cheap arm in Bryan Mitchell to do so. The Yankees have been the only club to cross the luxury-tax threshold every year of its existence. Yankees ownership has said a stated goal is to stay under the threshold in 2018.

Over the weekend, the Dodgers and Braves traded debt. Thanks to “Tom”, the Dodgers have a chance to remain below the 2018 threshold. Also over the weekend, the Giants moved Matt Moore and his $9 million 2018 salary to Texas in an apparent attempt to stay under the tax threshold.

Last season, six teams teams crossed the luxury threshold and were subject to tax. The Yankees have paid taxes 14 straight seasons, a tab totaling $325 million.

In 2018? At the moment, only the Red Sox project to open the season above the tax threshold, which increased from $189 million to $197 million this season.

While next year’s FA class is surely having an impact on some of these decisions, there is a powerful incentive for owners to keep payrolls below as many tax thresholds as possible. If you’re a large-market club that has crossed the tax threshold three or more consecutive years, and is $40 million or more above the threshold, those dollars above the top threshold are subject, essentially, to a 95% tax. That renders the $237 million threshold something akin to a hard cap.

The problem for the MLBPA is that this is targeting mostly large-market teams, the sort of organizations that are typically the suitors for top-of-the-market talent. Because of this, Eric Hosmer’s top suitor is the… Padres?

The Yankees, Dodgers — and maybe even the Red Sox — seem to be out on big-name items this winter.

That’s a problem for players and Scott Boras:

The other problem for players is that this cap is creating an impetus for teams to pursue NBA-style deals like the one executed by the Yankees with the Padres recently. From the MLBPA’s perspective, this essentially takes away a job from a free agent. Instead of the Padres signing a veteran free agent, they elected to buy younger, pre-arbitration talent. This is not the type of musical-chairs game the union wants. We’re going to see trades like this become more and more common, I suspect. From the club perceptive, they are logical and rational.

And we haven’t even discussed the draft and international penalties for exceeding the tax threshold.

Yes, players’ average salaries are at an all-time high, but it seems that the MLBPA fumbled their latest CBA negotiation. While some minor victories were perhaps won in regard to the qualifying offer, the union agreed to an arrangement that is suppressing veteran players’ salaries while also reducing jobs available to veteran players. The players elected to strike and prolong the 1994-95 labor fight in part due to the prospect of a salary cap. Now, they’ve essentially agreed to one — without the benefit of a payroll floor to complement it.

Are there going to be teams that still go above the tax threshold? Yes. But they are likely to be fewer in number, particularly in the case of the $40 million-above-the-threshold mark. Perhaps fewer will be inclined to cross the threshold for multiple years, as well. Teams might increasingly be less willing to target the middle class of free agents.

The push down on spending has never been greater, and there’s still nothing to force spending on the bottom payrolls. In addition to the skyrocketing values of franchises and the dollars generated by MLBAM, it’s more difficult to spend money on players. It’s a good time to be an owner.

We hoped you liked reading MLB’s Soft Cap Is Becoming More Rigid by Travis Sawchik!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.

newest oldest most voted
Psychic... Powerless...
Member
Member
Psychic... Powerless...

I’ve never understood why Tony Clark is head of the MLBPA. Wouldn’t you pick someone with experience in labor negotiations?

MikeD
Member
Member
MikeD

What’s most depressing is that the MLBPA, in an effort to keep the peace and the money flowing to its members, have almost assuredly and unknowingly laid the groundwork for a future strike when they attempt to claw back what they negotiated away.

Johnny Dickshot
Member
Johnny Dickshot

Virginia Seitz is the MLBPA’s lead outside counsel on CBA/labor negotiations. You should look up her credentials – Rhodes Scholar, Supreme Court clerk, current partner and GC for Sidley Austin, etc. She has lots and lots of experience in labor negotiations.

Do you actually think Tony Clark, by himself, sits and negotiates the CBA? Comments like this about Tony Clark’s inexperience are throwaway lines which do little but show the commenters’ unfamiliarity with how these things actually work.

abgb123
Member
abgb123

Have you paid any attention to what has happened since Tony Clark became head of the MLBPA? They have basically negotiated a floating cap into the last CBA, something the MLBPA has GONE ON STRIKE TO AVOID, multiple times too. They did this while receiving almost nothing in return, no less years of team control, no significant bump in cash flowing to the players, no fixing whats happening in the minors, no fixing player playing time manipulation, no piece of BAM and so on and so forth.
If Psychic… Powerless… is ignorant in anything it’s that he/she didn’t also spread the credit for incompetence around to Virginia Seitz among others. At one point the MLBPA was considered one of the best Unions in North America and certainly the best and most powerful sports union, they almost always came out ahead of MLB in negotiations and now every time they sit down at the table they come out with less. Tony Clark’s lack of involvement certainly isn’t a boost to the argument that his lack of negotiating ability isn’t hindering the MLBPA’s bargaining strength.

Johnny Dickshot
Member
Johnny Dickshot

Meh. This is the same BS, question-begging narrative I’m pointing out.

abgb123
Member
abgb123

lol how’s that kool-aid?

Paul22
Member
Paul22

It actually started under Weiner and Clark was his protege. Weiner of course was battling brain cancer.

Paul22
Member
Paul22

I dont see a lot of experience in actual labor negotiations for unions outside MLBPA whom she has been with as outside counsel for 20 years. She is not full time at MLBPA and has coauthored a paper staying strikes are not an option when economic stakes are high. She may be part of the problem since its been almost 20 years of decline for MLBPA. In the end she works for Tony and not the either way around. If he is willing to accept lesser deals its on him, she gets paid either way

She is also the DOJ leader that approved drones against citizens and recess appointments