Nationals Get Another Ace in Monster Deal with Patrick Corbin

No offense to Josh Donaldson, Steve Pearce, and Kurt Suzuki, but it appears the first big domino has fallen in this winter’s free agent class. Patrick Corbin is reportedly set to sign a six-year contract with the Nationals, per Chelsea Janes. Jon Heyman has reported the deal is for $140 million and, as most Nationals contracts do, it includes deferrals, per Ken Rosenthal, which lower somewhat the actual value of the contract. The Diamondbacks will get a draft pick after the first round for their troubles.

This might not quite qualify as mystery team material, but the industry consensus seemed to be that Corbin was likely to sign with the Phillies or the Yankees, making the Nationals moving in a bit of a surprise. Now, it would be appropriate to say the Nationals didn’t need pitching given that they already have Max Scherzer and Stephen Strasburg at the top of the rotation. But it would probably be even more appropriate to say every team needs pitching, and signing a pitcher of Patrick Corbin’s quality does a lot to help the Nationals as they try to recapture the division after a disappointing season and the seemingly likely departure of Bryce Harper.

As for how Corbin will perform, our own Dan Szymborksi was kind enough to pass along the following ZiPS projections:

ZiPS Projections – Patrick Corbin
Year W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2019 12 8 3.63 32 31 181.0 171 73 21 50 195 117 3.4
2020 11 7 3.63 31 29 173.7 163 70 20 47 185 117 3.3
2021 10 7 3.68 30 28 168.7 159 69 20 45 178 115 3.1
2022 9 7 3.71 27 26 153.0 145 63 18 41 161 115 2.8
2023 9 6 3.77 25 24 143.3 137 60 17 39 152 113 2.5
2024 8 6 3.82 24 23 134.3 129 57 17 38 143 111 2.3

These projections also line up with Steamer, which projected Corbin for 3.6 WAR next year. In his ranking of free agents, Kiley McDaniel placed Corbin third behind only Manny Machado and Bryce Harper. That status as the best pitcher available likely helped Corbin to a contract that exceed’s McDaniel’s five years and $90 million, as well as the Crowd’s five years and $100 million. Szymborski did the write-up in the free agent list and said the following:

With 6.3 WAR and 11 strikeouts per game, both marks representing career highs, Corbin would have been a strong Cy Young contender in a year during which Jacob deGrom didn’t brutalize the league. Of qualifying pitchers in baseball, Corbin’s contact rate of 66.8% was behind only deGrom’s, as well. Corbin and his filthy slider enter a free-agent market in which he’s no worse than the second-best pitcher available and, in my estimation, a more alluring signing for a team than Dallas Keuchel is.

With James Paxton already traded, Cleveland no doubt asking for a considerable haul for any of their starters, and the same likely true for Noah Syndergaard, there weren’t any available pitchers who had pitched like an ace in the last few years or looked to be able to do so next season. We often hear about a crowded market for certain positions, like second base or perhaps an innings-eating starter, but unless a team wanted to give up prospects, Patrick Corbin represented a market of one for many teams in the hunt.

If Corbin hits those projections above and amasses 17 wins over six seasons, this deal is going to end up looking pretty good even if it doesn’t look quite as linear as the projection shows. A couple of seasons of five wins, maybe a year missed due to injury, and a few average years would still represent a positive outcome. Corbin will turn 35 year old just as his contract is ending, and like any long term pitching contract, that comes with considerable risk. Corbin missed all of 2014 and much of 2015 recovering from Tommy John surgery, and he pitched poorly in his first full season back just a couple years ago. He was decent in 2017, and then he came into 2018 and started throwing his slider all of time. As Jeff Sullivan wrote at the beginning of the season:

Corbin used to throw more fastballs, but his fastballs aren’t great. And Corbin used to throw more changeups, but his changeups kept getting hit around. And so we’ve gotten to here, with Corbin attempting something new: different versions of the slider, to help one play off of the next. Corbin’s best pitch has always been his slider, so why not fold in an offspeed variety? The changeup just wasn’t going to work. The slider very well might.

For the season, Corbin ended up throwing his slider and slow slider/curve 50% of the time. The increased usage did nothing to hamper the pitch’s effectiveness, as 29% of the pitches were swinging strikes and 54% of plate appearances that ended on a slider were strikeouts. The change in usage turned Corbin from mid-rotation pitcher into an ace, and if he can keep this up, he’ll be well worth the money for the Nationals.

We should say, it isn’t just the prior Tommy John that is concerning long-term. Even last season, his fastball velocity was inconsistent, as the graph below shows.

The optimist says he got his velocity back at the end of the season and even without it, he was a very good pitcher. The pessimist wonders what happens if his velocity ticks down again and eventually affects his slider. That lost velocity coincided with a lower strikeout rate and more walks. It’s hard not to see the significant risks in signing a pitcher like Corbin for six years. He’s had arm trouble in the past, velocity trouble just this last season, and he’s only had one really good year since debuting in 2012. But the deal can pay off if Corbin just has a couple more years like this last one. In a division where Atlanta and Philadelphia are trying to add to their young cores, the Nationals were already stealth favorites due to their talent on hand. This deal should cement that position.

With Max Scherzer and Stephen Strasburg in the rotation, and Anthony Rendon, Trea Turner, Juan Soto in the lineup along with the potential addition of Victor Robles, the Nationals are likely to be the most talented team in the division even if the Phillies sign Bryce Harper. With Rendon a free agent after next season and Scherzer likely to start to feel his age at some point, it makes sense for the Nationals to try and capitalize on this competitive window even without Harper. And taking Corbin away from potentially signing with the Phillies increases their odds of getting back to the playoffs this year, too.

As for the Yankees, their failure to offer a sixth year will probably look smart in 2024, but if James Paxton can’t stay healthy and Luis Severino’s second half problems carry over, their decision might not look so good next summer. There is some upside above the projections for Corbin, and the Nationals decided to pay for it.

We hoped you liked reading Nationals Get Another Ace in Monster Deal with Patrick Corbin by Craig Edwards!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

newest oldest most voted
sadtrombone
Member
sadtrombone

Craig is absolutely right. This is the best arm on the FA market this past year. If you wanted a guy with ace potential, this is the only guy who looked like he would fit the bill. But he’s also not a guy who looked like an actual ace, like Greinke, Price, or Scherzer. And there’s no way we should write off the Nats now, not with that rotation.

So this landed right about where we would have guessed based on past market norms–at Yu Darvish money. When you take into account that there are no opt-outs, no-trade provisions, and deferred money, it’s actually probably less valuable than Darvish’s contract was. I don’t know whether it was smart or not, but I don’t think the Nationals got taken here and I don’t think Corbin left anything on the table. At the minimum from the team’s perspective, I like it way better than Arrieta’s deal last year for the Phillies.

WriterNeilR
Member

They would’ve been far better off without him. His fastball speed is down, he has no track record of success, he’s not even projected to be an ace going forward by Craig’s own article.

sadtrombone
Member
sadtrombone

No, if you want that, there are only about 4-7 guys in the league who fit that description, and the Nats already have one. They’re buying the potential for an ace. I get why the projection systems are down on him, since he lost a whole year and wasn’t back to his old self for two more years after that. Also, because he’s a pitcher, and pitchers break. But if you want a guy who has turned in an ace-level season recently, he was the only guy you could sign on the FA market. If he was projected for 5 wins he would be getting a Scherzer/Price/Greinke deal, not the Cueto/Darvish/Zimmermann deal.

Of course, it is fair to note that it has a decent change being a bad deal merely because most free agent contracts wind up being bad deals in hindsight. This one, however, doesn’t strike me as being a particularly bad one among the numerous bad contracts in free agency.

fjtorres
Member
fjtorres

They don’t need him to be an Ace. The just need him to be the best #3 in the league. That’s a low bar.

Moranall
Member
Moranall

Your narrative is bad. His FB velo bottomed out in May and steadily climbed the rest of the season, with September matching his April velo… and very similar to his 2016 and 2017 FB velos.

Easyenough
Member
Member
Easyenough

And the Nats seem to want to work with injury risk. It was also going to be an ugly look when Bryce signed elsewhere, but with two good catchers and a new mid rotation pitcher, with pitches that are different than scherzer and straps, fans like me are excited about this team.