Taking a Swing at a Mark Reynolds Trade

Mark Reynolds’ skill set is one of the most combustible in the majors and this season he busted more than he boomed. That Kevin Towers is supposedly looking to shear some strikeouts from his new roster means Reynolds is almost certainly on the market. Those familiar with Towers’ dealings, like Padres fan Marc Normandin, suggested as much moments after Towers took over. If such presage comes to fruition, then we should witness one of the most interesting trades in recent memory.

The 26-year-old third baseman is due $5 million next season and is under team control through the 2013 season at a cost of roughly $23.5 million. Towers’ trade partner may only be concerned with the next season or two if acquiring Reynolds to push his team over the top, but assume that Reynolds’ performance over the duration of the deal is under the microscope. What are we to make of his prospects?

Reynolds fans a lot. In 2007, he broke onto the scene striking out 35.2% of the time. That number has increased in each subsequent season (now up to 41.9%) and even those who refuse to trust trends over weighted averages have to admit the roof on Reynolds’ strikeouts sits uncomfortably high, even in an era where high-power, strikeout-heavy hitters are romanticized more than ever before.

Finding a comparable is difficult. Dave Kingman struck out a lot, but as much as Reynolds has over such an established length of time. Adam Dunn strikes out a lot and yet his career average (32%) would represent a career-low for Reynolds. Rob Deer might be the truest comparison and his career took the form of a downward spiral after turning 27.

How do other teams evaluate Reynolds? Do any teams view Reynolds as Dunn with fewer walkways and more holes in the wall? Does any team hold a belief that their hitting coaches and instructors could work tirelessly with him and curb his hackitude? Do they view him as a two-win player with four-win potential, or as something more with league-average downside?

There is a lot of risk involved in each aspect of a Reynolds’ deal. The acquiring team risks Reynolds flaming out while on their payroll. Without knowing the suitors or the asking price, the opportunity cost does not lend itself easily to speculation.

The aforementioned Normandin – who knows Towers’ tendencies about as well as anyone in the analytical community – suggests that Towers would probably take a stack of arms the other organization considers disposable. Think the Jake Peavy deal, which lifted a burdensome contract from San Diego’s books while allotting four usable arms into the system.

Towers runs the risk of angering the portion of his new fan base with their minds on home runs and runs batted in, while also placating those with phobia of strikeouts. To complicate manners, Towers has no obvious heirs in his cabinet and a parched free agent class presents few temptations. There’s a chance the D-Backs could run with filler at third base next year which means they would probably want at least one player near the majors in order to avoid a total public relations meltdown if/when the new third baseman failed to lace up Reynolds’ offensive boots.

Occasionally a trade becomes a microcosm for the player involved. This is one of those cases, as a Reynolds’ deal stands a good chance of becoming a homer or a strikeout.



Print This Post





Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Dan
Guest
Dan

Toronto Blue Jays seem like a great trade partner.

Toronto (80-75) is good enough to be adding parts rather then selling.

Edwin Encarnacion is the only player in the way of the 3rd base job.

In case anyone hasn’t noticed, Toronto has become a big fan of the long balls.

Toronto has plenty of pitching depth.

The big hinderence to the trade would obviously be: does Toronto value its pitching depth more than an Reynolds at 3rd?

Don’t know. But Toronto is a good place to start some trade speculation.

LeeTro
Member
Member
LeeTro

That was my other logical trading partner. They are probably more able to give a viable package back to Arizona, since the White Sox have given up a lot of pitching for Peavy and Jackson.

Mark
Guest
Mark

I’d rather see the Jays move Bautista to 3B and look for an OF then trade pitching to get a 3B. I’m not a big fan of Reynolds, and if anything the Jays need to move away from the all or nothing HR strategy.

Joe D.
Member
Joe D.

You’d have to think that if Towers was able to get Cecil or Rczep———-ski for Reynolds, he’d jump on it.

Mark
Guest
Mark

Yeah that’s not gonna happen.

Trebecois
Guest
Trebecois

maybe Marcum if they add a prospect or two

wpDiscuz