Team Preview: San Francisco Giants

Fifty-six years in San Francisco and one World Series title. Most Giants fans are probably set for another fifty-six years, and for some it’s time to get greedy. Unfortunately, despite some fundamental flaws that existed even during their improbable title run, the team did little over the offseason to inspire confidence. Can their mix of flawed veteran position players and elite starting pitching fuel another run?

The Starting Nine

CF Andres Torres
2B Freddy Sanchez
1B Aubrey Huff
C Buster Posey
3B Pablo Sandoval
RF Cody Ross
LF Pat Burrell / Mark DeRosa
SS Miguel Tejada

For a team that scored the ninth-most runs in the National League last year, this lineup isn’t as bad as the reputation that precedes it. Six of the nine regulars were above-average, and the other two – Sandoval and Tejada – sported wRC+ numbers above 90. A little bounce-back from the slimmer Panda might mask some every-other-year regression from Aubrey Huff, and the overall effect might be similar. For every inch that Torres gives up, a full year of Buster Posey and Cody Ross might gain back.

The problem is that, aside from Sandoval and Posey, none of the players listed here own much upside beyond what they showed last year, at least on a rate level. And even though a healthy Mark DeRosa might shore up the bench and help in left field, it’s unclear how much more he’s worth than Mike Fontenot at this point in his career. DeRo’s league-average bat is now supplemented by a below-average glove at the corners.

At least the team has super-prospect Brandon Belt waiting in the wings. If the team’s number one prospect is as good as expected, he could give the middle of this aging lineup the youthful jolt they need. Judging from Huff’s aging glove and Belt’s raging athleticism, it’s probably left field that’s crying out for the strapping Belt.

The Pitching Staff

RHP Tim Lincecum
RHP Matt Cain
LHP Jonathan Sanchez
LHP Madison Bumgarner
LHP Barry Zito

CL RHP Brian Wilson
RHP Sergio Romo
LHP Javier Lopez
RHP Santiago Casilla
LHP Dan Runzler
RHP Guillermo Mota
LHP Jeremy Affeldt
RHP Ramon Ramirez

The rotation is obviously the strength of this team. Even if Matt Cain is a candidate for regression – either because he’s outproduced his peripherals or because he put up a career-high innings total last year – he’s an above-average pitcher who fits his home ballpark to a T. And, let’s not spend any more words on him here, as very smart people are still trying their best to figure him out.

Speaking of regression, though, it’s worth realizing that most of this rotation just hit career-high single-season innings totals. Lincecum pitched his second-most, while Sanchez, Cain and Bumgarner reached new heights. It’s a young staff, but we’ve seen other rotations take a hit after pitching deep into the postseason. And, judging from the signing of retread Brian Lawrence, there’s not a ton of depth waiting in the wings.

Could the bullpen shoulder more of the load in the coming season? There are enough young (and exciting) arms in the collection to make it work. Beyond The Beard, there’s the lesser-known but equally-impressive beard (and arm) of Sergio Romo. Santiago Casilla (aka Jairo Garcia) brings heat and induces ground balls but has struggled with inconsistency over his young career. And then, since you can never have too many LOOGYs, you’ve got your standard three left-handers in the pen. Overkill!

Key Player

Apologies to Brandon Belt, who so obviously has next, but it’s Aubrey Huff that matters most to the Giants in 2011. Or, at least he matters most first. Because if Huff doesn’t manage to at least approximate his work from last season, then it will fall on Sandoval and Belt’s broad shoulders to lift the offense out of stagnation.

If it seems like Huff has oscillated from useful to replacement over his career, it’s because he has. In fact, he’s been fairly consistent in his inconsistency. Since 2004, here are his WAR totals: 4.6, 0.1, 1.3, 0.7, 4.0, -1.4, 5.7. So if the pendulum continues to swing as it has, he’ll have a poor 2011. Mostly, his power seems to be at the root of his swings. Check out his career ISO graph.

It’s not his BABIP that’s causing these swings either: since 2004, his best BABIP has been .310. His flyball percentage has been fairly consistent over that time period, too. It’s probably nothing, but you can see that Huff encountered his fastest fastballs in 2007 (91.3 MPH) and 2009 (91.4 MPH), and those were two of his worst power seasons. Since he feasts on fastballs (+148.8 career runs by pitch type values), that could mean something. Or it could mean nothing.

His career-best walk rate will probably relax toward the mean, but if Huff can manage to retain his power, he’ll be enough of an anchor to make this team work. The projections assume he’ll take a step back with the bat (.174-.186 ISOs), but even that more reduced power level might be okay if Sandoval picks up some of the slack. The real danger is that Huff drops to the league-average power levels he’s shown in his bad years while his walk rate also falls back to career levels (8.3% BB% career). Then he’ll be close to a negative on both sides of the ball. Then there will surely be a panicked call to Fresno, a mid-season trade – or both.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

70 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark
13 years ago

Out of curiosity, what is/was the Giants’ “fundamental flaw”? Are you referring to their roughly league-average offense? Because I would argue that being average in anything is not a “fundamental flaw.”

Of course, I might just be missing the point altogether, in which case I apologize.

dernjg
13 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Seriously? They’re old? The average age of the lineup you cite is younger than the White Sox or the Yankees. If Belt starts over Burrell, the average age drops to Devil Rays levels.
If you’re saying old as in not fast, you haven’t given enough of a look at Torres. Yes, he’s in his 30s, but there’s not a lot of miles on those legs.
If you’re saying they’re not good defensively, please look into thinks like the UZR.
If you’re saying things based off assumptions from the team three years ago, please note that 2011 will be the first full Giants seasons for Posey, Ross and Burrell. And hopefully a lot of playing time for Belt. Add in a fit Panda, and suddenly the team has a 1-2-3 punch of young studs all under the age of 25, and you’re saying AGED?

quincy0191
13 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

At 23 years old, Pablo produced like a league-average third baseman. This was met with cries of fear and horror because he was one of the best 3Bs in baseball in 2009. When your average season is enough to make fans wonder about the fortunes of the team, whether you should be traded, etc., then you’re a stud.

Huff and Burrell are both 34, the age they’ll be for the whole season unless the Giants make the playoffs again (Burrell turns 35 in October). They are elder statesmen, but they’re not really OLD, more like entering their decline phase.

The Giants’ offense as a whole isn’t particularly young, with only Sandoval, Posey, Ross, and possibly Belt below 30. On the other hand, they were pretty good offensively last year, and outstanding defensively last year. Losing Uribe will hurt, but Sanchez is going to play a full season. Ross is a plus defender in right. Posey’s great behind the plate. Huff isn’t nearly as bad as advertised. Tejada is a potential liability. Sandoval’s dropped enough weight to regain his average range and has a good arm. But the Giants as a whole aren’t really flawed in any area, unless you consider “average at worst” to be flawed. The problem is, outside their pitching, they’re not really all that great in any area either, and there aren’t a lot of backup options. OTOH, not a lot of teams have a roster of potential stars just waiting in AAA for an injury or ineffective player.

William
13 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

If Sandoval has an average season, and continues to be an average 3B…he’s not really a stud. It’s too early in his career to say which way he’ll be going, but it’s not exactly like he’s a stud.
Players start declining more around 32 I believe, and by 34 they’re fully into their decline. The past season for Huff and Burrell should be treated more as the exception than the norm.
Their offense is only average if all of the old role players continue to have career years. Posey playing for a full year would also help, but keep in mind that Posey had a ridiculously good year for a catcher, and he would be really hard-pressed to put up a better season.