More On Early 2019 Statcast Hitting Trends

On Tuesday, I shared some early Statcast statistic trends and compared them with historical marks going back to 2015. Unfortunately, I compared April 2019 numbers to full season marks from previous seasons, which wasn’t exactly apples to apples. I have corrected that error and spent some time collecting data only through the end of April for all previous seasons. So let’s try this again.

Statcast Exit Velocity & Distance Trends
Season Avg Exit Velocity (MPH) Avg Fly Ball Exit Velocity (MPH) Avg Fly Ball Distance (ft) HR/FB
2015* 87.4 90.2 316 11.4%
2016* 87.7 91.1 316 12.8%
2017* 87.1 91.6 320 13.7%
2018* 88.4 92.4 318 12.7%
2019 88.3 92.3 321 14.6%
*Data through the end of April of that season

On Tuesday, it appeared that overall exit velocity and fly ball exit velocity had spiked this year versus last. When cutting off the data to just through April though, we actually learn that both marks peaked last season and are down ever so slightly from that mark. What this means is that oddly exit velocity declined after April last season, which is opposite of what we expected to see.

This April, batters are essentially hitting it just as hard as last April, but their fly balls are traveling three feet further. That’s strange. Adding to the weirdness is that last April, batters posted an exit velocity 0.8 MPH higher than in 2017, yet the ball traveled two feet less. Was this the effects of the juiced ball in 2017?

Looking at the combination of fly ball exit velocity and distance, they generally match the HR/FB rate trends. However, the changes between the EV and distance marks from season to seasons are pretty minor, which you wouldn’t expect to drive such dramatic changes in HR/FB rate. If it’s not just fly ball exit velocity and distance, what else could it be?

Statcast Barrel Exit Velocity & Distance Trends
Season Avg Barrel Exit Velocity (MPH) Avg Barrel Distance (ft)
2015* 102.9 394
2016* 103.4 395
2017* 103.6 399
2018* 104.1 392
2019 104.0 398
*Data through the end of April of that season

We found out on Tuesday that batters were barreling their fly balls at a significantly higher rate this year, a mark that has risen each season since 2015. But perhaps those barrels weren’t as “barrely” as previous years, so the exit velocity and distance have barely budged? There are more of them, resulting in a higher HR/FB rate, but they are of lower quality, resulting in similar exit velocity in distance marks. That’s the hypothesis.

I isolated the exit velocity and distance on just barreled fly balls to find out if this was the case. Nope! These numbers showed the exact same trends as the previous table using all fly balls. Exit velocity here is down ever so slightly from last year, while distance is back up (though this time it’s just below the 2017 distance).

There’s one more piece to the puzzle which I shared in last week’s hitting trends post.

Statcast Pulled Fly Ball% Trend
Season Pulled Fly Ball%
2015* 21.5%
2016* 21.8%
2017* 24.3%
2018* 23.5%
2019 25.4%
*Data through the end of April of that season

So while I still can’t figure out how batters are barreling up their flies far more frequently, and yet exit velocity and distance have barely budged, this table is key. Batters are pulling a higher rate of their fly balls, which is the batted ball direction that easily leads to the highest HR/FB rate. So they are certainly making the most of those fly balls and actually don’t need as high an exit velocity or distance to hit the ball out.

All my questions haven’t been answered, but this is a better start to understanding what’s going on with homers over the first month of the 2019 season.





Mike Podhorzer is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year. He produces player projections using his own forecasting system and is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. His projections helped him win the inaugural 2013 Tout Wars mixed draft league. Follow Mike on Twitter @MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dl80
4 years ago

Is there any reason to believe weather has something to do with it? In such a small sample size, a few warmer or colder (or wetter or dryer) games could easily swing things, couldn’t they?

So perhaps batters are making better contact but the weather is depressing how fast it goes off the bat and also distance?

whiptydojoe
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

That was my initial thought as well. I wouldn’t know where to find the quick data, but I remember more rainouts/delays in April last year (I realize a rainout would cancel the game, but the effects were obviously present in the atmosphere in the area.)

This is a very off the beaten path way of associating it, but I own an ice cream shop in Cincinnati. Our sales from this March/April are destroying our sales figures from last year, and it’s mostly due to the weather we experienced last year. (We’ve literally doubled-our sales for April–weather was significant last year.)

TheEmbassy
4 years ago
Reply to  whiptydojoe

Ice cream sales are up? Oh, no, here comes the crime.

jmalletmember
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I agree, this needs to normalized for temperature

YKnotDisco
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

FWIW:

2015 April temperature 53.1
2016 April temperature 53.2
2017 April temperature 53.8
2018 April temperature 48.9!

Pulled from National Climate Report/NOAA