2026 Projections






ZiPS:
Select
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • Steamer:
    Select
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012

  • General Projections
    Steamer:
    Select
  • Overall - No Split
  • vs LHP
  • vs RHP
  • Steamer (RoS):
    Select
  • Overall - No Split
  • vs LHP
  • vs RHP
  • Context Neutral
    Steamer:
    Select
  • Overall - No Split
  • vs LHP
  • vs RHP
  • Steamer (RoS)
    Select
  • Overall - No Split
  • vs LHP
  • vs RHP
  • 600 PA / 200 IP
    3-Year
    Historical Projections
    Members Exclusive Data
    ZiPS:
    Select
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • Steamer:
    Select
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • Splits - Steamer Projections
    Members Exclusive Data
    Steamer:
    Select
  • Overall - No Split
  • vs LHP
  • vs RHP
  • Steamer Ros:
    Select
  • Overall - No Split
  • vs LHP
  • vs RHP
  • Steamer
    (Context Neutral):
    Select
  • Overall - No Split
  • vs LHP
  • vs RHP
  • Steamer RoS
    (Context Neutral):
    Select
  • Overall - No Split
  • vs LHP
  • vs RHP
  • Data Export [Members Only]
    #NameTeamGPAHRRRBISBBB%K%ISOBABIPAVGOBPSLGwOBAwRC+BsROffDefWAR
    1Trea TurnerPHI143627188971286.4%18.1%.157.323.283.333.440.3351133.713.67.24.3
    2Bryce HarperPHI140607268284912.3%21.3%.214.312.272.365.486.364133-0.223.5-10.13.4
    3Kyle SchwarberPHI1506574197104614.8%28.1%.266.260.230.351.495.362132-1.923.2-17.32.8
    4J.T. RealmutoPHI12147414555476.6%24.1%.157.310.253.311.409.31398-0.4-1.311.02.6
    5Bryson StottPHI136555136658238.7%16.6%.134.287.255.322.389.311971.80.13.92.3
    6Alec BohmPHI13356214647036.5%15.7%.140.302.273.323.413.319103-1.00.70.92.1
    7Brandon MarshPHI121475135852119.7%28.1%.156.340.256.330.412.3231050.33.4-3.91.6
    8Justin CrawfordPHI11445665741247.1%20.8%.100.331.266.321.367.303911.6-3.0-0.81.2
    9Adolis GarcíaPHI135562246878116.6%25.9%.190.275.234.290.423.307940.1-3.8-6.10.9
    10Edmundo SosaPHI662457292934.2%22.8%.162.295.248.293.410.304920.1-2.21.30.7
    11Rafael MarchánPHI451593161617.9%17.1%.107.258.226.297.333.28076-0.3-4.84.40.5
    12Otto KempPHI582237272646.9%28.4%.159.306.234.308.394.30794-0.2-1.8-3.40.2
    13Derek HillPHI381414161345.9%28.6%.141.307.232.285.374.287820.2-2.8-0.10.2
    14Garrett StubbsPHI183003307.7%22.4%.083.266.210.279.294.258600.0-1.41.90.1
    15Dylan MoorePHI481726231899.4%29.9%.167.264.205.293.372.293850.4-2.7-1.70.1
    16Johan RojasPHI2383110745.3%21.9%.107.296.236.283.343.275720.4-2.30.70.1
    17Gabriel Rincones Jr.PHI124716519.8%27.1%.141.276.216.298.357.289820.0-1.00.40.1
    18Dylan CarlsonPHI281082121119.8%23.2%.129.275.224.308.353.294860.0-1.8-1.40.0
    19Aidan MillerPHI145517539.6%26.4%.127.297.226.313.353.297880.1-0.7-0.70.0
    20Liover PegueroPHI102913315.8%25.6%.122.281.222.272.344.270690.0-1.00.20.0
    21Bryan De La CruzPHI124314505.9%28.9%.120.311.231.278.351.27573-0.1-1.5-0.8-0.1
    22Pedro LeónPHI83013316.8%31.7%.158.278.209.272.367.280760.0-0.9-2.1-0.2
    #NameTeamGPAHRRRBISBBB%K%ISOBABIPAVGOBPSLGwOBAwRC+BsROffDefWAR
    1Trea TurnerPHI143627188971286.4%18.1%.157.323.283.333.440.3351133.713.67.24.3
    2Bryce HarperPHI140607268284912.3%21.3%.214.312.272.365.486.364133-0.223.5-10.13.4
    3Kyle SchwarberPHI1506574197104614.8%28.1%.266.260.230.351.495.362132-1.923.2-17.32.8
    4J.T. RealmutoPHI12147414555476.6%24.1%.157.310.253.311.409.31398-0.4-1.311.02.6
    5Bryson StottPHI136555136658238.7%16.6%.134.287.255.322.389.311971.80.13.92.3
    6Alec BohmPHI13356214647036.5%15.7%.140.302.273.323.413.319103-1.00.70.92.1
    7Brandon MarshPHI121475135852119.7%28.1%.156.340.256.330.412.3231050.33.4-3.91.6
    8Justin CrawfordPHI11445665741247.1%20.8%.100.331.266.321.367.303911.6-3.0-0.81.2
    9Adolis GarcíaPHI135562246878116.6%25.9%.190.275.234.290.423.307940.1-3.8-6.10.9
    10Edmundo SosaPHI662457292934.2%22.8%.162.295.248.293.410.304920.1-2.21.30.7
    11Rafael MarchánPHI451593161617.9%17.1%.107.258.226.297.333.28076-0.3-4.84.40.5
    12Otto KempPHI582237272646.9%28.4%.159.306.234.308.394.30794-0.2-1.8-3.40.2
    13Derek HillPHI381414161345.9%28.6%.141.307.232.285.374.287820.2-2.8-0.10.2
    14Garrett StubbsPHI183003307.7%22.4%.083.266.210.279.294.258600.0-1.41.90.1
    15Dylan MoorePHI481726231899.4%29.9%.167.264.205.293.372.293850.4-2.7-1.70.1
    16Johan RojasPHI2383110745.3%21.9%.107.296.236.283.343.275720.4-2.30.70.1
    17Gabriel Rincones Jr.PHI124716519.8%27.1%.141.276.216.298.357.289820.0-1.00.40.1
    18Dylan CarlsonPHI281082121119.8%23.2%.129.275.224.308.353.294860.0-1.8-1.40.0
    19Aidan MillerPHI145517539.6%26.4%.127.297.226.313.353.297880.1-0.7-0.70.0
    20Liover PegueroPHI102913315.8%25.6%.122.281.222.272.344.270690.0-1.00.20.0
    21Bryan De La CruzPHI124314505.9%28.9%.120.311.231.278.351.27573-0.1-1.5-0.8-0.1
    22Pedro LeónPHI83013316.8%31.7%.158.278.209.272.367.280760.0-0.9-2.1-0.2
    of 1
    Page Size:
    1 - 22 of 22 results
    of 1
    Page Size:
    1 - 22 of 22 results
    • ZiPS:ZiPS Projections courtesy of Dan Szymborski
    • ZiPS DC:ZiPS Projections pro-rated to Depth Charts playing time
    • Steamer:Steamer Projections courtesy of steamerprojections.com
    • Depth Charts:FanGraphs Depth Chart projections are a combination of ZiPS and Steamer projections with playing time allocated by our staff.
    • ATC:ATC Projections courtesy of Ariel Cohen
    • THE BAT:THE BAT projections courtesy of Derek Carty. DFS version of THE BAT available at RotoGrinders. Sports betting version of THE BAT available at EV Analytics
    • THE BAT X:THE BAT X projections courtesy of Derek Carty. DFS version of THE BAT X available at RotoGrinders. Sports betting version of THE BAT X available at EV Analytics
    • OOPSY:OOPSY projections courtesy of Jordan Rosenblum with Depth Charts playing time, and OOPSYPeak use neutral playing time. Other flavors available at scoutthestatline.com. Stuff+ courtesy of Eno Sarris.

    • On-Pace - Every Game Played:Please note, these are not projections. They represent a player's current seasons stats pro-rated for the remaining games in the season if they were to play in every single remaining game*. This is not how a player will actually perform the rest of the season, and should not be used for anything other than your own personal amusement. (*Starters pitch every 4.5 days and relievers pitch every 2.5 days.)
    • On-Pace - Games Played %:Please note, these are not projections. They represent a player's current seasons stats prorated for the remaining games in the season if they were to play the same percentage of total games they have already played this season. This is not how a player will actually perform the rest of the season, and should not be used for anything other than your own personal amusement.
    • RoS:Rest of Season
    • Update:Updated In-Season

    • ADP:ADP data provided courtesy of National Fantasy Baseball Championship
    • Inter-Projection Standard Deviation (InterSD):The standard deviation of the underlying projections surrounding the ATC average auction value. InterSD describes how much the projections disagree about the value of a player. The larger the InterSD, the more projections differ.
    • Inter-Projection Skewness (InterSK):The skewness of the underlying projections surrounding the ATC average auction value. InterSK describes the symmetry of the underlying projections. A positive InterSK means that a player’s mean is being pulled to the upside; the majority of projections are lower than the ATC average. A negative InterSK means that a player’s mean is being pulled to the downside; the majority of projections are higher than the ATC average.
    • Intra-Projection Standard Deviation (IntraSD):The standard deviation of a player’s categorical Z-Scores. IntraSD is a measure of the dimension of a player’s statistical profile. The smaller the IntraSD, the more balanced the individual player’s category contributions are. The larger the IntraSD, the more unbalanced the player’s category contributions are.