Bud Selig: Baseball’s Best Commissioner

Columnist George Will writes a letter to the editor at Forbes, defending Bud Selig against claims that he was asleep at the switch as far as PEDs were concerned and that he has, overall, been a poor commissioner. Money quote:

Steve, serious baseball fans argue about everything–the best hitter, the best World Series, the best left-handed catcher from northeast South Dakota. But they do not argue about who has been the best commissioner. That title goes to the ninth commissioner–Selig.

Alrighty then.

It’s a long letter touching on many topics, so you should click through to read it.

For my part, I think Will is generally right in lauding the fact that MLB’s financial house has been put in order under Selig, even if it would be innaccurate to give sole credit to His Budship. It happened on his watch, he did many smart things, and he got the hell out of the way when it was wise to so, and that’s better than many executives can say.

Will is off base, however, in claiming that Selig would have put down PED use in baseball if that big bad union hadn’t stopped him. The truth of the matter is that both the union and ownership showed a profound lack of desire to tackle PED use in the Major Leagues prior to Jose Canseco’s book and the subsequent hoopla. While it is true that Selig put drug testing on the table in the 1994 CBA negotiations, it was, by most accounts, a throwaway proposal designed to give the union something to reject so that Selig could more effectively demand other things. The clear priority of the first decade of Selig’s tenure was to break or at the very least weaken the union and to do whatever he could to allow the smaller market teams to gain the financial upper hand over the Steinbrenners of the ownership group. If he had used a quarter of his energy and political capital to attack steroids that he used to achieve his financial goals, there is a good chance that something could have been done about PED much sooner, union opposition or no.


Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
MooseinOhio
Guest
MooseinOhio

Didn’t the use of PEDs by players aid in the economic recovery of baseball from the strike and loss of a WS?  If so, and I believe it was a major factor, then Selig’s lack of real action on PEDs was very intentional and had a direct relationship to the financial well-being of the sport that Will is giving him credit for.

Jacob Rothberg
Guest
Jacob Rothberg

It is articles like this that make the tragic loss of John Brattain all the more difficult to handle. If ever there was someone who could properly eviscerate these kind of asinine assumptions it was him. Godspeed John.

Jason @ IIATMS
Guest
Jason @ IIATMS

I bash Selig as much as anyone, but he did get the Wildcard into the game and while it has only “slowed” the Yanks, there is revenue sharing and a luxury tax. 

And over-expansion.  And the insipid All-star game “this one counts” horsesh*t.  At least the World Series game start at a sane hour…wait, nevermind.

tadthebad
Guest
tadthebad
Craig, Riding Moose’s coattails here, which would you consider the more important venture: earlier, legitimate attempts to lessen PEDs, or establishing revenue sharing for the benefit of the smaller market teams?  I think Moose makes a great point that PEDs helped build the financial strength of MLB after 1994, but I would also argue that the revenue sharing was more important than PED investigations.  And to be clear, I’m not a Selig supporter.  I just think that using the PED veil to get the revenue sharing was a good move.  Regardless, I think George Will is off-base in his praise… Read more »
Craig Calcaterra
Guest
Craig Calcaterra
Interesting question, Tad. I’d say that the revenue stuff was more important to figure out because I believe that financial instability is/was a far greater risk to the game than PEDs, and Selig’s first duty is to the game. I will still call Selig out on this, however, if he (or in this case, his surrogates) insist on claiming that he was truly interested in ridding the game of steroids long ago, only to meet with union opposition.  The honest answer—“hey, we had more important priorities than PEDs between 1994-2002, and I felt it necessary to focus on them”—would never… Read more »
Ron
Guest
Ron

John Hoffman.

That would be the best left-handed catcher from northeast South Dakota.

He’s from Aberdeen.

Just in case anyone was wondering?

Grant
Guest
Grant

George Will blaming something bad on a union? first and only time it’ll ever happen.

tadthebad
Guest
tadthebad

Craig, you’re right, that phrase will never cross Selig’s lips.  It’s too bad, though, because it’s true and establishes the fact that Selig at least had priorities.  However, given his ridiculous stance that he never even knew about PEDs way back in the day, such a statement would expose him as a fraud.  On top of that, the MSM would kill him for declaring the economics of MLB were more important than exposing PEDs.

Yeah, he’s the best alright, George.  Yikes.

Sean
Guest
Sean

If George Will can crown Bud Selig our greatest commissioner based on the expansive profits made by Major League Baseball under his watch, we can only assume he also feels that Bill Clinton is our greatest president because of the great economic period he presided over. It only makes sense…

Richard in Dallas
Guest
Richard in Dallas

In order to come to a definitive conclusion on the merits if King Bud, one must ask oneself the most important question of all:

Is Baseball better off now than on the day Fay Vincent was fired?

Jacob Rothberg
Guest
Jacob Rothberg

Craig,
The phrase that should cross Selig’s lips is simply: “On my watch there has been a serious betrayal of the trust that our fans place in the purity of our sport and its players. I am the Commissioner of Baseball, and as such, ultimately, all responsibility rests on my shoulders. I am sincerely sorry and I promise it won’t happen ever again.”
Just an apology. That’s all that is necessary.

Rob
Guest
Rob

I’d just like to pose one silly little question to all of you Bud-bashers: Who was better, and why?

If Bud is so terrible, wouldn’t someone would have mentioned a commissioner better than him by this point in the comments?

Criticize Bud if you will, but maybe you should hold off until you can tell me who has/would do a better job.

I’ll wait for your response.

jason11
Guest
jason11
I dont know how to value the job that Selig did in regards to baseball’s finances….but I suspect that the praise being thrown at him is exactly the same as the praise being thrown at real estate and financial analysts up until mid 2008. How much credit should Selig get for being in charge during one of the longest bull markets in history and the huge real estate bubble? I suspect that given what was going on in the US and world economies over the last 15+ years a well dressed monkey could have led MLB to record revenues. How… Read more »
Thomas J. Comer
Guest
Thomas J. Comer

Bud Selig has done some good things, I’m not a Bud Basher.  Not sure if he’s the best commissioner ever, but who knows. 

That said, anyone who claims they didn’t know or suspect about PED’s until 2002 is definitely incredibly ignorant or lying.  Thomas Boswell was writing about the steroid issue as early as 1988. 

TC

Pete Toms
Guest
Pete Toms
@ Alex.  I’m in the camp who think the color barrier was broken not because it was the “right thing” but because it helped MLB’s bottom line. I don’t think Chandler or Rickey were great civil rights activists, just pragmatists. Maury (amongst others probably) describes Selig as a CEO as opposed to a Commissioner.  I think this is apt (albeit, the merits of it are arguable).  Bart G and Vincent tried to act as Commissioners but couldn’t keep the players on field.  Noble guys but ineffective. I think it is telling that there is little response here to the question… Read more »
Alex Remington
Guest
Alex Remington
Baseball hasn’t had a lot of wonderful Commissioners, but: for his role in breaking baseball’s color line, despite all his other buffoonery, Happy Chandler deserves a serious spot in the discussion. Bart Giamatti didn’t live long enough to do much, but he was a nice enough guy. Judge Landis was a self-aggrandizing racist jerk. Bowie Kuhn was a jerk who instituted the DH. Ford Frick didn’t rock the boat too much, other than the home run asterisk thing, and in the historical scheme of things that seems rather minor to me. Selig has presided over baseball’s tremendous financial growth, and… Read more »
Rob
Guest
Rob
Tad, Of course serious fans can argue about this. My only point is that when I look down Bud’s list of achievements, I don’t see another commish who comes close to that. Even with some of his negatives pulling him down, I still argue he’s the best. That said, I can see why someone would disagree (though no one has put forth an argument for any other commissioner yet…). Jason11, Want proof a monkey couldn’t lead a league to prosperity over the past 15 years? Three words: National Hockey League. Even the NBA suffered a bit during the .com boom… Read more »
Rob
Guest
Rob

JoePos (from a few months ago) with a great take on why we fail to appreciate Bud: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/joe_posnanski/10/29/selig/index.html

Also, I’d like to point out that since the first Collective Bargaining Agreement was signed, we are currently in the midst of the longest era of labor peace the sport has seen. Presiding over 15 years of labor stability when no other commissioner was able to make it 9 is rather impressive.

tadthebad
Guest
tadthebad

Rob,

I’m not declaring Bud as the worst Commish ever, nor the best.  He’s done some good things and some bad things.  But as Alex mentioned, for Will to say that if we’re serious fans we can’t argue this “fact” is a bit ridiculous, don’t you think?

wpDiscuz