Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
ChuckO
Guest
ChuckO

Could it be that there’s not much thought involved for a lot of writers?

Chuck
Guest
Chuck

With the explanations now public for the Verlander first place vote and one of the Hernandez first place votes, I think I’m just as happy at *not* being given a look behind the curtain. What passes for logic can be downright frightening.

jwb
Guest
jwb

Let’s just say this is several orders of magnitude more deserving of respect than a certain writer’s HOF vote explanation.
http://www.rickeyhendersoncollectibles.com/2009/01/response-from-mr-corky-simpson.html

MJ
Guest
MJ

Let’s just say this is several orders of magnitude more deserving of respect than a certain writer’s HOF vote explanation.
http://www.rickeyhendersoncollectibles.com/2009/01/response-from-mr-corky-simpson.html

I’ve always heard/read rumors that writers would pull that, [wish I could say I’m] shocked that someone would have the stones to actually admit it =\

MJ
Guest
MJ

From the comments:

“I haven’t read much of Christina, but just might start. I assume she is a female, but one that knows a lot about baseball…”

Bwah!??!?!

[not trying to start a debate]the question is sort of valid, but I can almost 100% guarantee the commentor has no idea why.

Palooka Joe
Guest
Palooka Joe

I guarantee that most votes didn’t have a dissertation like that behind them. It’s a shame too. This seems like a great topic for an off-season article.

From the comments:

“I haven’t read much of Christina, but just might start. I assume she is a female, but one that knows a lot about baseball…”

Bwah!??!?!

wpDiscuz