Lew Wolff’s “sob story”

I missed this from the other day, but Oakland’s City Attorney John Russo has ripped A’s owner Lew Wolff a new one:

Oakland A’s managing partner Lew Wolff is a talented and smart businessman.

But if Wolff thinks anybody is buying his sob story about why the A’s have to leave Oakland, he’s seriously underestimating the intelligence of the team’s fan base, the press and the people of this city.

Wolff has been telling reporters and anyone who will listen that the A’s have done everything possible to build a new ballpark and stay in Oakland. As Wolff put it in a recent press release, the team has “exhausted (its) time and resources over the years” with the city.

Claiming the A’s have made an exhaustive effort to stay in Oakland is like George W. Bush saying he did everything he could to stay out of Iraq – it’s not a “reality-based” statement.

Here is the truth: A’s owners and Major League Baseball have been plotting to abandon Oakland for at least 10 years. They have never been partners in the city’s efforts to build a new stadium and keep the franchise in Oakland.

Russo goes on to detail the nature of the farce that has been the MLB’s putative efforts to keep the A’s in Oakland (which he calls “collusion”), and winds up by saying “The idea that the A’s have made an exhaustive effort to stay is disingenuous at best.”

I’d be far less likely to take this seriously if we didn’t have an excellent example Major League Baseball and a Bud-friendly owner conspiring to kill a team already. So as it stands, yeah, I think Russo is right.


Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Nate
Guest
Nate

Craig, how familiar are you with the inner-workings of Oakland? The city is horribly run from top to bottom, so I take any and all comments from spokespeople like this with a huge grain of salt. One would think a city attorney would be more concerned about his city’s alarming repeat-offender crime rate before tackling the potential loss of a franchise that as any regular attendee will confirm has been an afterthought of the city for at least a decade.

Craig Calcaterra
Guest
Craig Calcaterra

Nate—I’m generally aware that Oakland government is a lunatic asylum, but that doesn’t mean Russo is wrong about this.  I can’t think of a single example in which MLB has played straight with a city, especially when Bud cronies are involved, and all information I’ve seen about this independent of Oakland sources suggest that Wolff is using Oakland at best, spitting on it at worst.

As for his motives, eh, he’s an elected official and that’s the kind of thing they do.  Still doesn’t mean he’s wrong.

Aaron Moreno
Guest
Aaron Moreno

I like how the writer had to stretch it out a bit to take a shot at Bush. Maybe he had a word count to meet.

tadthebad
Guest
tadthebad

Nate,

You know, I used to think the Commonwealth of MA was, far and away, the worst run state in the country.  But the more I read about other cities/counties/states, it’s clear that incompetency is a nation-wide illness.  Forget swine flu, public “service” hackery is the nation’s fastest growing pandemic.

Chipmaker
Guest
Chipmaker
If MLB is in on the gig, and I don’t doubt that, why has it not, years ago, quashed the Giants’ territorial rights issue and let the A’s move to San Jose? There’s no law behind it; territories is MLB policy, and one borne of concerns that were relevant in the first half of the 20th century but not nearly so today. Figure that Magowan, by using his own money to build PacBell (in unofficial defiance of unofficial policy, that of always, always using Other People’s Money to build ballparks), had already earned Selig’s enmity; taking away SJ would have… Read more »
carl
Guest
carl

There are differences between Oakland and Montreal – the Expos were paid NOTHING for television rights and, as I remember it, were basically not allowed to get any money for them.  Fans ignored the team and the stadium literally fell apart around them.  And the only time they were good, baseball went on strike.

I do not think the Expos were in fact viable.  While Bud has a lot to answer for, getting the Expos out of Montreal really had to happen.  now, the way it was done… that’s a different thing.

themower
Guest
themower

If the A’s and MLB have really been plotting 10 years to get the A’s out of Oakland, then what’s the end game?  What city out there is a better alternative to Oakland?  Portland, Las Vegas, Charlotte…?  I don’t see it.

the mower
Guest
the mower

In regards to mlb and the a’s plotting 10 YEARS to get out of oakland, if you can’t find a new city/sucker to give you a better stadium agreement in 10 years, maybe you should just stay put.  i was living in denver when the a’s were supposed to be coming in 1980, that didn’t happen, and any other a’s move isn’t going to happen.  mlb and the a’s need oakland to work, and they need to make it work.

RJK
Guest
RJK
Relative to the post above, the end game is to find a city that will give an outstanding stadium arrangement.  It only takes one.  10 years ago, did anyone really think Oklahoma City would have an NBA team.  What Lew Wolff is lacking is a “co-conspirator” city that is ready fill ownership’s pockets with public money.  Las Vegas presents a some unique problems, but what about Memphis, Nashville, OKC, Tulsa, or Portland?  I suspect Charlotte would have been in the running were it not for the present banking woes.  I don’t think ownership looks broadly as to a better alternative. … Read more »
RJK
Guest
RJK
I absolutely disagree w/ the Carl’s above assertion that baseball had to leave Montreal. Admittedly, the park was awful and people did not come for the last 10 years or so.  However, during the late 70’s and thru the mid 80’s, the Expos were in the top four of the NL in attendance, finishing 2nd in attendance in ‘83.  Montreal has about 3.7M in its statistical area, which would make it the 14th largest area in the US, b/w the Twin Cities and Denver.  Unfortunately, Montreal was plagued by horrendous ownership once Bronfman pulled out.  Following the Seagram’s folks, Brochu… Read more »
gt
Guest
gt
One thing about Oakland that’s important to understand, is that it is not a large city of it’s own, but is a very small city, at the center of an enormous region that includes San Francisco and San Jose, and has over 7 million people within an hour’s drive.  The city itself has a couple of real bad neighborhoods that contribute to the negative press, but overall it’s quite an attractive and wealthy place.  MLB should not be hasty to abandon this great central location in the nation’s 5th largest metropolitan area. Unfortunately for the A’s, their current ballpark is… Read more »
wpDiscuz