My Morning in Exile

All of the cool kids are on their way to the SABR convention in D.C., so I’m doing a little extra duty over at the Blue Network this morning:

  • Vin Scully, legend; Bill Plaschke, idiot.
  • Dustin Pedroia will tell you: length doesn’t matter.
  • Nats Park gets more expensive.
  • Dice-K is starting to get the beatdown from the Boston media.
  • The Astros must have borrowed that little tiki necklace from the Brady boys
  • Was Bud just sending up a trial balloon with that Pete Rose business?
  • Moneyball wasn’t a failure; it worked too well.
  • Cliff Lee is about to be dealt to Philly.
  • and if Tyler Hissey is right, it may be a very good deal for Philly.
  • I didn’t want to go to SABR anyway . . .[grumble grumble grumble].


    Print This Post
    Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
    YankeesfanLen
    Guest
    YankeesfanLen

    You complain about Columbus and then want to go to Washington at the end of July? The temperature and humidity add up to 200 this time of year.
    Oh……you wanted a beer with Barack.
    Seriously, Vin would only get the proper send-off if he had taken the Yankees offer in ‘64

    MooseinOhio
    Guest
    MooseinOhio
    I suspect that for every homerun the Green Monster gives to pop ups that would be warning track outs it takes aways in solidly hit line drives that would clear most left field fences but are doubles in Fenway.  I suspect Jim Rice would have had at least 50 more homeruns playing in most any other ballpark. Of course, Wade Boggs probably would have had 100 fewer doubles as many of his defensive swings resulted in doubles that hit midway up the wall and probably would have been outs in most ballparks. However, isn’t that part of the beauty of… Read more »
    tadthebad
    Guest
    tadthebad
    I’m not sure I dispute the point, but how do YOU know that the Sox brass are using the media as their instrument or that Dan Shaughnessy has long been a mouthpiece for Sox management?  Given your recent little infatuation with the Red Sox, maybe you aim to take that title?  Hmmm, hmm?  Come to think of it, you’re becoming just as cranky with the Red Sox as CHB…that oughtta scare you.  I think the epic media beatdown Daisuke receives is due mostly to the slow news time you mentioned, and the fact that most fans, Boston’s included, don’t tolerate… Read more »
    Brian
    Guest
    Brian

    I’m pretty sure the A’s have had that taboo hidden in their clubhouse for three years running.

    http://bradytaboo.ytmnd.com

    MooseinOhio
    Guest
    MooseinOhio
    I’m not sure I would call Shaughnessy a mouthpiece for Sox management either because pre-2004 WS he tended to take as many opportunities as possible to rip and/or stir up the waters regarding the Sox.  If I recall correctly it was his insider information (Lucchino) article regarding the Nomar contract situation that lit the fuse that on that powder keg, resulting in his departure from Boston.  Shaughnessy lost one of his old standby storylines (i.e. Curse of the Bambino) the moment Foulke tossed the ball over to Dougie M ending 86 years of drama.  Dan made a living writing about… Read more »
    Will
    Guest
    Will

    And the Pedroia thread appears to be devolving into yet another typical Yankees V. Red Sox pissing contest.
    This is why every year I root for Baltimore and Tampa Bay to place first and second in the AL East.

    Tom
    Guest
    Tom

    Oswalt’s back is hurt?!

    *camera zooms in on necklaces*

    NANANANANAAAAAAA!

    Wooden U. Lykteneau
    Guest
    Wooden U. Lykteneau
    Craig – The ballpark deal has not changed, nor has its financing. Fenty is proposing to use a revenue stream other than its intended purpose – in layman’s terms, he’s robbing Peter to pay Paul. Happens all the time in local government, most famously with school superintendents using “building maintenance” funds to pay for school supplies. Oddly enough, taxpayers will say “no” when asked to pay for new textbooks but “yes” when asked to pay for a new roof. Funny how that works. Say what you will about borrowing money in the first place, but the fault of how the… Read more »
    Craig Calcaterra
    Guest
    Craig Calcaterra

    Wooden—but if they’re taking money that was to be used to service ballpark debt for something else, doesn’t that mean they aren’t servicing ballpark debt?  And doesn’t that, in turn, mean that they have to pay longer, at higher rates, or with some sorts of penalties?

    I don’t mean to equate it with consumer credit like that, but generally speaking, if you take your debt payments and apply them elsewhere, doesn’t your outstanding debt increase?  If it didn’t, why bother ever paying off the debt at all?

    Wooden U. Lykteneau
    Guest
    Wooden U. Lykteneau
    Yes, that’s what it means—but the label of “ballpark” is irrelevant and misleading. Here’s an example… D.C. borrowed money to build a library, then incurred a library tax to pay for the library building loan, but decided to use the library tax monies for something else, it doesn’t mean it was a bad idea to build the library. It just means that the debt on the library building loan will increase. Kevin Reichard, who runs ballparkdigest.com, has a similar love/hate relationship with public monies and stadia albeit at much smaller scale (think $15-50M vs. 500M), but has long remarked that… Read more »
    wpDiscuz