New York Giants star Babe Ruth

The photo at the left features Babe Ruth in a New York Giants uniform. He wore the uniform when he participated in a charity game in 1923. That was the same year that the Yankees moved out of the Polo Grounds and into their new stadium in the Bronx. That was also the year that the Yankees finally defeated the Giants in the World Series after losing to their in city rivals in 1921 and 1922.

image

Ruth was the most popular player in all of baseball, let alone New York. The Yankees, once the irrelevant Highlanders, would surpass the Giants at the box office. And while the Giants would continue to win pennants (including four in a row between 1921 and 1924), they would see their place as the dominant team in New York fade as the Yankees became a juggernaut. The Yankees’ dominance would remain almost uninterrupted from the early 1920s until the mid 1960s. By then the Giants had moved across country to San Francisco. And most people point to the arrival of Ruth as the beginning of the Yankees’ stranglehold on the World Series (and maybe even the Red Sox’s eight decades of World Series futility!).

However, Ruth’s connection to the Giants could have been more direct than a charity game. And perhaps if a few factors had been slightly different, the Giants would remain the toast of New York and had their rightful place as the most dominant team in baseball.

John McGraw, the Federal League and the Baltimore connection

Babe Ruth’s legend began at St. Mary’s Industrial School in Baltimore, where he had lived since his early childhood. He developed into a top baseball prospect within the school’s walls and caught the attention of Jack Dunn, the owner of the minor league Baltimore Orioles. Dunn felt so strongly that Ruth could make it as a ballplayer that he not only signed him, but adopted him. Legally, the 19-year-old Ruth needed to be adopted to be released from the school. Imagine a first-round pick needing to sign adoption papers today.

His relationship with Dunn made his Orioles teammates to call him “Dunn’s Babe” and the name Babe Ruth stuck. So did Ruth’s abilities; he shone as a hitter and a pitcher for the Orioles. The problem for Dunn was not on the field but across town. A third major league, the Federal League, put big league talent in cities that had no National or American League teams. That meant the Baltimore Terrapins started playing literally across the street from the Orioles. Babe Ruth would be playing in front of crowds of 100 or less and Dunn knew he had to sell some of his players to pay back his debts.

Dunn was borrowing money from his former partner, Joe Lannin, who by 1914 owned the Providence Grays, a minor league team with connections to the Boston Red Sox. Dunn knew that Lannin could afford to purchase Ruth’s contract. But there was another interested party.

The Giants’ legendary manager, John McGraw, who had played for the Orioles when they were part of the National League, was friends with Dunn. McGraw had seen Ruth play when the Orioles played Newark and offered Dunn $5,000 for him.

However, the Orioles were about to return home and the home town hero Ruth was beginning to draw more customers into the park. Dunn told McGraw that he wouldn’t sell Ruth just yet.

Dunn then contacted Lannin and offered catcher Ben Eagan, pitcher Ernie Shore and Ruth for the total of $8,500. Eagan, who had big league experience, was the biggest prospect in the package, being worth $3,500. He would finish as a .165 hitter in 122 games over four seasons. Ruth was worth $2,900 in the deal.

McGraw read of the deal and was enraged that not only did he not acquire Ruth, but that he offered more than what the Orioles finally got for him.

When Ruth’s impact on the league became clear, Dunn tried to appease McGraw by selling him pitcher Jack Bentley, who flamed out after a few seasons. Later Dunn offered another pitcher to the Giants but McGraw was no longer speaking to him. The pitcher he was offered was future Hall of Famer Lefty Grove, who went to the Philadelphia Athletics.

Had Babe been a Giant

Had Ruth gone to the Giants, the impact on baseball history would have been seismic. Ruth would have arrived in the Polo Grounds in either 1914 or 1915, just as the Giants were on the heels of three straight pennants between 1911 and 1913. He would have been teammates with future Hall of Famers Christy Mathewson, Rube Marquard, High Pockets Kelly and Ross Youngs. And the wild Ruth, whose behavior eventually helped push him out of Boston, would have found his match in New York with McGraw. Like Ruth, McGraw was a tough Irishman from Baltimore. And no doubt he would have imposed his will on Ruth as well harnessed his many talents.

Under McGraw, Ruth probably would have remained a pitcher as well as an outfielder on his off days. McGraw would have seen the value of the dominant left hander on the mound every five days and the home run power into the short right field porch the other four days.

As the Mathewson era ended with World War I, it would be Ruth in the Polo Grounds who would become the biggest draw in New York. Even if the Yankees poached all of the other Red Sox stars after the 1918 World Series, Ruth and the Giants would reign supreme. Without Ruth, the Giants won five pennants in eight years between 1917 and 1924. With Ruth the gap would have been closed even further.

By the mid 1920s, as Ruth would enter his greatest years, imagine pairing him with Hall of Famers Bill Terry, Frankie Frisch and even Rogers Hornsby for the 1927 season.

As Ruth’s career waned in the early 1930s, the hitting torch would be passed to Terry, Travis Jackson and Mel Ott and the title of pitching ace would transfer to Carl Hubbell. The transition of dominance of the 1900s, 1910s and 1920s would continue through the 1930s. The Giants won the 1933 World Series as well as the 1936 and 1937 pennants. The 30s might have been even more dominant.

Mental Health and the CBA
A particular bit of language in the latest CBA could have negative consequences for some players.

The Yankees played in New York?

But the chances of a Yankees dynasty without the drawing power of Ruth would have been diminished. Without the drawing power of Ruth, chances are the Yankees would have been a second class citizen in New York. Much like the Braves in Boston or the Browns in St. Louis, the Yankees would probably have had the little brother quality. Perhaps they would have won a pennant here or there. But the ability to buy the best prospects and not have to sell off their best players during the 1930s and 1940s would have been remote.

If the Giants had continued their dominance into the 1940s, it might have been the Yankees who looked west for brighter prospects. By the 1950s, it was clear that the push of the population out of the cities and into the suburbs and the west had made two franchises in most cities unrealistic. The Giants’ move was a foregone conclusion by the mid 1950s. Had they been the main attraction of the city, it would have been the Yankees flirting with Minneapolis and San Francisco for a relocation.

Maybe the expansion Mets would have been an American League team to replace the San Francisco Yankees. Perhaps New York fans would be crowing about the Giants’ 27 titles. Maybe the greatest baseball debate would have been “Who was the greatest Giant? Babe Ruth or Willie Mays?”

Maybe Ruth would have had his 714 homers and 300 wins.

These are a lot of maybes that could have been answered had Jack Dunn sold Babe Ruth’s contract to the Giants for $5,000.

References & Resources
“The Real Babe Ruth” by Dan Daniel. Baseball Reference.


Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
John
Guest
John

If the Yankees went to San Fran, they probably would have changed the name to the Seals.

Paul Francis Sullivan
Guest
Paul Francis Sullivan

Maybe… but then again the Dodgers kept their name and there are no trolleys to dodge in Los Angeles

gdc
Guest
gdc

If the Yankees went to SF they would have brought back DiMaggio as hitting coach, assuming they had gotten him to begin with.  And maybe Tony Lazzeri as manager.

J. Lincoln Hallowell Jr.
Guest
J. Lincoln Hallowell Jr.
Had Babe Ruth played the bulk of his career in the Polo Grounds, there’s no telling how many home runs he would have hit, with the even shorter right field line than Yankee Stadium.  800 dingers would not have been out of the question. Also, had the Yankees been forced to leave New York in 1957, chances are that they wouldn’t have been replaced in the American League at all. New York was a National League town in 1957, and really, through the 1980’s (the Mets frequently outdrew the Yankees, even in years when the Mets were awful.)  New York… Read more »
BobDD
Guest
BobDD

A lot of what-ifs there, but the most intriguing to me is what if Ruth had stayed in shape and played defense.  In your scenario he’d have started his OF days a couple years earlier, and being in shape would have extended his awesome prime and perhaps even his career another two years.  I’ve always thought that one of the most amazing things about Ruth is that he was so out of shape the last half of his career that he looked unathletic.  Nice fantasy there Sully.

Paul Francis Sullivan
Guest
Paul Francis Sullivan

He was out of shape and yet played for 22 seasons.

He had 13 seasons as an elite hitter (a 200 OPS+ in 1932 at age 37!)

He had 4 1/2 seasons as an elite pitcher.

Most in shape people would take 17 1/2 elite seasons in the bigs.

Steve Treder
Guest
Steve Treder

“Like Ruth, McGraw was a tough Irishman from Baltimore.”

Ruth was a German-American and McGraw, though he had played in Baltimore for many years, was from upstate New York.

But that’s a quibble.  An intriguing piece.

BobDD
Guest
BobDD
Yeah, what he said!!!  Not only better than I said, but even better than what I was thinking.  How could the Babe do that?  I remember watching Satchel Paige pitch in the PCL in 1960 – only average that year – but just astounded that he could even do that in his 50’s.  BTW, I bugged my Dad to take me and my brother to that game because the Portland Oregonian sports page previewed that game with a headline calling ol’ Satch “the Babe Ruth of Pitchers” – and I still think of the two of them as the most… Read more »
BobDD
Guest
BobDD

aw hell, not Morganna King but Morganna Roberts, the Kissing Bandit who also had two er, talents.

George
Guest
George

In 1928 my 8-year-old father went to his first ballgame at Yankee Stadium.  Babe Ruth hit a home run and dad was hooked as a Yankee fan for the next 80 years.  Does this fantasy mean that more than eight decades and three generations of family fandom would have been given to the Giants?  It shakes my universe to its core.

Steve Treder
Guest
Steve Treder

Well, I’d have grown up as a San Francisco Yankees fan.  There is that.

Dominic
Guest
Dominic

“the Giants would remain the toast of New York and had their rightful place as the most dominant team in baseball.”

I like the sound of that!

Brent
Guest
Brent

Here’s some Ruth/Giants trivia. Babe Ruth played with McGraw’s New York Giants during a tour of Cuba in late October/early November 1920. (A Cuban baseball promoter reportedly paid Ruth $2,000 per game.) During that tour, the Cuban and Negro league star, Cristobal Torriente, famously out-homered Ruth.

InnocentBystander
Guest
InnocentBystander

Having trouble seeing the Yanks in SF. The Giants move was in tandem with the Dodgers…two teams from the same league needed to go west so that the travel made sense for the rest of the league. Other than that, some fun speculation in the article.

Steve Treder
Guest
Steve Treder

“Having trouble seeing the Yanks in SF. The Giants move was in tandem with the Dodgers…two teams from the same league needed to go west so that the travel made sense for the rest of the league.”

Very true.  (Which was why the AL’s actual travel scheduling with just the Angels on the west coast from 1961-67 was quite awkward.)  But in the mid-to-late 1950s it wouldn’t have been implausible to see a second AL team decide to move west along with the Yankees, such as the Senators or the Indians.

Paul Francis Sullivan
Guest
Paul Francis Sullivan

Steve,

you will note I said “Almost uninterrupted.”

They won 6 pennants and 3 World Series in the 1920s
They won 5 pennants and 5 World Series in the 1930s
They won 5 pennants and 4 World Series in the 1940s
They won 8 pennants and 6 World Series in the 1950s
They won 5 pennants and 2 World Series in the 1960s

If that isn’t an almost uninterrupted stretch I don’t know what is

Philip
Guest
Philip
Intriguing, to say the least! No curse! No Yankee Stadium? (not so sure about that). But certainly No Bucky Bleeping Dent. A few thoughts: If Ed Barrow saw the wisdom in taking Ruth off the mound and making him an everyday player, surely the greatest manager of all-time, John McGraw, would have, too. Other Ramifications? THE INSURRECTOS The Giants don’t get jealous (yet) and kick the Yankees out of the Polo Grounds (yet), so Yankee Stadium doesn’t get built (yet). But thanks to Ed Barrow’s skills, the Yankees still build a reasonably strong team in 20s and 30s, signing players… Read more »
Steve I
Guest
Steve I

“The Yankees’ dominance would remain almost uninterrupted from the early 1920s until the mid 1960s.”

That’s a bit of an overstatement.  From 1929 through 1935, they won a single pennant.  Still a good franchise, of course.

A highly-speculative, highly-entertaining article.  Thank you.

Philip
Guest
Philip

CLARIFYING:

‘‘It’s said in 1943 that only Isoroku Yamamoto did what the American League couldn’t: stop the Red Sox dominance after Boston rolled off five straight pennants, 1938-1942. The Red Sox roll over Cincinnati in 1939 to win their first World Series since 1912.’‘

[Which means the Cubs probably win the ‘38 series, so ending a 30-year drought – unless the Giants use their new found financial dominance to make the 5-game difference in the pennant race.]

Steve I
Guest
Steve I

Paul,
I did note that, and I’m a little sorry now I already deleted my spreadsheet on Yankee “uninterruptedness.”

I was pointing out that the Casey Stengel/Yogi Berra Yankees were the uninterrupted Yankees, and was not intending to demean the Ruth Yankees (or DiMaggio Yankees, or Mantle Yankees, or whatever 1920-1965 Yankees).

The Ruthian Yankees were interrupted quite a lot.  (I hasten to add that I haven’t crunched the numbers, and it’s entirely possible NY exceeded expectations.)

Steve I
Guest
Steve I

It’s kind of like Detroit with Kaline and Cash and Freehan: how do you Not win the pennant?  Well, there are many ways.

Ted M
Guest
Ted M
I don’t know… for me when I think of what would have happened had Ruth gone to the Giants and McGraw I run into two things.  One is that McGraw was rigid and authoritarian and Ruth would have had a huge problem with that.  I expect there would have been huge conflicts between them and that Babe’s performance probably would have suffered because of it. The second is Jack Bentley.  Bently, from 1920-1922, pitched and played first base for the Baltimore Orioles of the International league…hitting .371, .412, and .351 while going 16-3 2.10, 12-1 2.34, 13-2 1.73 in those… Read more »
mando3b
Guest
mando3b

I love stuff like this! Here’s something to add fuel to the fire: What if the Browns had been able to finalize their move to LA in the early ‘40s? As I understand it, that was a done deal until WW II intervened. What would the baseball landscape look like now if BOTH fantasies had become real: Ruth to the Giants, with all the dominoes falling as in Sullivan’s piece here, AND the Browns moving to LA in 1940? The mind fairly reels . . .

obsessivegiantscompulsive
Guest
obsessivegiantscompulsive

Great article, thanks!

This is another great What If with the Giants that would have had huge implications for the team and the majors.

The other was that the Giants were reportedly close to signing Hank Aaron, before losing him to the Braves.  Maybe they never move to SF if they had Mays and Aaron drawing crowds in NY?

Another big Giants twist, though I don’t know how it affects the majors, was that reportedly some other team was in on Mays before New York signed him, can’t recall which team though.

Steve Treder
Guest
Steve Treder
“What if the Browns had been able to finalize their move to LA in the early ‘40s? As I understand it, that was a done deal until WW II intervened.” It wasn’t a done deal.  It was on the AL Winter Meeting agenda for Monday, December 8th, 1941, and subsequently scuttled for obvious reasons.  But a proposal was all it was; it was far from certain to be approved by the necessary majority of league owners. And there was a very good reason for the league to not approve it:  the travel logistics to and from the West Coast in… Read more »
ksw
Guest
ksw

very nice piece.
the yankees would have been competitive in the lesser league, drawing nicely (400,000 a year), and stayed as the third franchise in new york.
had the team been moved, it is likely that it would have been shifted to baltimore, a city with twice the population of bronx county.
browns to the west coast with veech running the team, with the senators following them.
ksw

voxpoptart
Guest
voxpoptart
The notion that Babe Ruth’s pitching career would have lasted any longer looks, from here, like a fantasy.  At age 21, he was striking out close to 5 batters per nine innings, which was a lot for the time, and had a K/W ratio over 1.4 to 1, also pretty good at the time.  But by age 24, his strikeout rate was TWO batters per nine innings, and he was walking twice as many batters as he struck out. Looks to me like, in the tradition of young pitchers everywhere, he’d destroyed his throwing arm.  Lucky thing about the ability… Read more »
wpDiscuz