Sandberg on Sosa

Ryne Sandberg thinks Sammy Sosa won’t make the Hall of Fame and believes that he shouldn’t make the Hall of Fame. I agree with the first part and, while my mind isn’t 100% made up about it yet, I’m inclined to disagree with the second part. Either way, neither Sandberg’s position on that or mine is terribly interesting. I do find this kind of interesting, though:

Sandberg and Sosa were Cubs teammates from 1992 to ’94 and from ’96 to ’97.

“I was around Sammy for about five years before I retired, and there wasn’t anything going on then,” Sandberg said. “I did admire the hard work he put in. He was one of the first guys down to the batting cage, hitting extra. I figured he was working out hard in the offseason to get bigger. It was just happening throughout the game, that even myself was blinded by what was really happening, maybe starting in the ’98 season.

I’d like to know if there’s any evidence upon which Sandberg bases his “Sammy didn’t use until 1998” position, because it seems awful convenient for him to say that nothing untoward was happening until the very moment those two stopped sharing a clubhouse. Sosa was on a 50+ homer pace in 1996 before an injury ended his season. Was it not possible that he was using then too? If he wasn’t, isn’t it the case that the progression to 66 homers a couple of years later isn’t quite as unnatural as it seemed?

My point here isn’t to try and pinpoint when Sammy started taking PEDs — I don’t know that and neither do you and neither does Ryne Sandberg. The point is that comments such as Sandberg’s represent an attempt at drawing lines, however subtly, between heroes and villains that does not reflect what actually occurred in the game over the past couple of decades. There were almost certainly people in the Cubs’ clubhouse using steroids before Ryne Sandberg retired at the end of the 1997 season, and there were definitely people in the league using steroids before then too. I suspect that Sandberg and other putative non-users knew that on some level, and for them to say they didn’t today strikes me as implausible and rather self-serving.

Jose Canseco did not invent steroids in 1988 and hand them to McGwire and Sosa at a secret summit meeting in the winter of 1997. They were all over and around the game, and if you believe the massive amounts of reporting that has been done on the subject, they were openly discussed by users and non-users, players, ownership and media. If people wish to be serious when it comes to steroids in baseball, it would be helpful if they’d acknowledge that fact rather than scapegoat the big targets and feign ignorance.


Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Seth
Guest
Seth

I tend to agree with you. I’d like to think that Sandberg wasn’t a steroid guy, but we’re never going to get past all of this if people keep making statements like this.

That being said, I agree with Sandberg that Sosa shouldn’t make the Hall of Fame. Not only the steroids, but also the corked bat proved that he was in no way concerned with the purity of his game.

Jack Marshall
Guest
Jack Marshall
All evidence indicates that Sandberg is a genuine integrity-and-honor guy (his speech at the Hall of Fame is a classic), so his opinion here was highly predictable. And we can’t discount this well-documented effect: people are often slow to suspect others of conduct they would never consider themselves. I have been deceived by drug-abusing friends and alcohol-addicted loved ones much of my life, and I even now have a tendency to overlook clear symptoms of addiction and abuse out of good will, hope, naivete, and an apparently flat learning curve. I was once in the cast of a musical that… Read more »
Derek
Guest
Derek
I’m with Jack on Sandberg.  I don’t think he’s being disingenuously self-serving.  Naive, probably.  There’s at least some reason to believe Sosa was more secretive about his use than some of the other players who’ve been caught and were clearly part of a multi-player steroid nexus on their ballclub.  It’s possible that Sandberg never saw anything himself. Re:  Seth on Sosa, it’s far from clear that Sosa absolutely belongs in the Hall on merit—JAWS doesn’t love him, for example—but I think that boiling down his HoF case to just whether he was “concerned with the purity of the game” seems… Read more »
Tom
Guest
Tom

The problem with all of this is that if you ask Sandberg if he used steroids, his answer is the same given by Sosa, Palmeiro, McGwire, or any other player.  Just because no one cared about steroids in the 80’s and 90’s doesn’t mean that no one was taking them.  So whatever any player and former player says about the subject probably should be taken with a grain of salt.

Jack Marshall
Guest
Jack Marshall
I don’t understand this argument. So because Benedict Arnold and George Washington would have given the same answer if asked if they were in the process of betraying their country, we have to conclude that Washington may have been lying too? Why are baseball players in a special category where the only thing that bears on their credibility is their occupation? There should always be a presumption of innocence, shouldn’t there, until there is some tangible, logical reason for suspicion? This is the next step from Ibanez, isn’t it…the automatic presumption that despite appearing to your peers and the public… Read more »
Aaron Moreno
Guest
Aaron Moreno

What matters here is that Ryno was not around when Sammy took steroids, and you have nothing to connect the two. Sandberg has no knowledge of these events you speak of, and you all should just move along.

Dave
Guest
Dave
Rather than saying a player’s denial of PED use should be “taken with a grain of salt” it would be better to adopt the notion that we can’t know with complete certainty whether a player was/is clean or dirty unless he admits use or tests positive (sadly, there is no definitive negative in this case).  But it is absolutely valid to make statements of probability based on the information available.  Sandberg’s record suggests non-use while Sosa’s record, prior to the revelation about the 2003 test, was more suspicious.  That being said, until the sport and the public reach an equilibrium… Read more »
TC
Guest
TC

I think the chronology of steroids is interesting.  Canseco is huge and juiced and hitting taters in 1988.  Then… nothing until 1998? 

I’d be curious to read a story about steroid use in 1992 when Fred McGriff led the league with 35 homers.

TC
Guest
TC

Gunz—

Clear steroid injury?  WTF?  I have no idea if Bo was on anything at all, but, I ask, what makes a “clear steroid injury”?  If anything, the effects of steroid abuse are UN-clear.

gunznfnrozez
Guest
gunznfnrozez

Ever get a look at Bo…?

More seriously, to shatter a hip in that area, even in the NFL, is extremely rare, especially since he had no family history of hip issues.  The hip is a common injection site which weakens the bone in the area.  Outside of the visual evidence on Bo, this is a clear indication not only of steroid use, but of the injection site.

Craig Calcaterra
Guest
Craig Calcaterra

Gunz: you’re just speculating. You have no evidence of anything Bo Jackson ever did wrt PEDs, let alone “clear” evidence, and if you have nothing more, I’d prefer it if you couch your accusations in that regard in appropriately speculative terms.

gunznfnrozez
Guest
gunznfnrozez

How about a simple “Bo Knows Roids”?

Or a more complicated one…

The facts, the nature of the injury, and the visual evidence, as well as the rampant steroid use in the NFL, strongly suggest that “Bo Knows Roids”.

gunznfnrozez
Guest
gunznfnrozez

Let me follow w/ an explanation.  This is not to say I dislike Bo, I actually loved Bo and still do.  Do I have enough evidence to convict the guy?  No, but then again, apparently there wasn’t enough evidence to convict OJ of murder.

Craig Calcaterra
Guest
Craig Calcaterra
Believe what you want to.  Personally, I’ve seen no evidence plausibly suggesting that ever used steroids.  There are people who have been bigger than Bo Jackson. There are people who were faster. Yes, he was the total package, but he was not enough of a freak of nature where simply looking at the man should convince anyone of anything. What’s more, his hip injury was a contact injury, not a degenerative thing we’ve seen with some PED users. And if none of that sways you, try this on for size: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=2033967 Bo knows lawsuits, so again, I suggest you tread… Read more »
TC
Guest
TC

Gunz-

Prince is having double hip replacement surgery.  No family history.  Lifestyle is low impact (in comparison to Bo, at least).  No trauma to the area. 

What do you think?  ‘Roids?  Injected through both hips to help him hit the high notes? 

You’ve got one line of thought: steroid abuse can lead to weakened muscle and bone at the site of injection.  The problem is that Bo’s hips underwent such extreme exertion and trauma as a result of his football playing that it’s impossible to sit in your armchair and positively conclude that Bo juiced.

gunznfnrozez
Guest
gunznfnrozez
I understand you want irrefutable evidence, and wanting to avoid speculation and a witch hunt etc.  I don’t have an axe to grind at all.  But to me, the guy was clearly a juice head, and i say that in the least offensive way possible, the guy was a tremendous specimen, as are Arod, manny, and bonds. Outside of an admission or a tell-all biography, which he would have no real incentive to do, we’ll never know for sure.  To me, the signs point to steroid use.  A shattered hip at that age, even in light of the hit he… Read more »
RoyceTheBaseballHack
Guest
RoyceTheBaseballHack
Re: Bo Knows Speed For what it’s worth, from his Wikipedia page, “…He also ran a 4.12 40 yard dash, still considered the fastest verifiable 40 time at an NFL Combine.[2][3]” I was in my late 20’s when Bo was doing all of this baseballing and footballing, and based upon what I saw him do, live and on TV broadcasts, and what his contemporaries did, I am not of the opinion that Bo Juiced.  I think he was just one of those, ‘once in a generation’ type of remarkable dudes who was blessed with other-worldly ability.  I can appreciate how… Read more »
Ben2009
Guest
Ben2009

Sosa shouldn’t make the HOF because “he was in no way concerned with the purity of his game.”??  Since when has the game been pure?  Even if you accept the pre-Jackie Robinson era as a product of the times, how concerned was celebrated cheater and HOFer Gaylord Perry with the “purity of the game”?  Not very – he was concerned with being effective, and he was.  Same with Sosa and, for that matter, anyone else who used PEDs.  That’s not to say using PEDs isn’t cheating – it is – but so is throwing a spitball.

gunznfnrozez
Guest
gunznfnrozez
Steroids were invented in the 50’s, their use popularized in amateur sports in the 60’s by the Soviets, rampant by the late 60’s and early 70’s.  While their use may not have been popular or their benefits fully understood in baseball until the late 80’s (not just Canseco, but others, see: Bo Jackson, who lost his career to a clear steroid injury), who’s to say that some pro players from the early 80’s, late 70’s, or earlier weren’t using them in some form or another?  At this point, I, and think the public in general is tired of the discussion,… Read more »
wpDiscuz