The ethicist part two: pulling a fast one

I am not attempting to appropriate Randy Cohen’s job, I swear. But it just so happens I ran up against another ethically questionable move in one of my leagues this week. Since last week’s column got a pretty good response, I’d like to get the readership’s feelings regarding a maneuver many of you have probably encountered or even attempted.

Friday afternoon, I got a call from my co-manager who saw a trade proposal come through his iPhone. He was cautiously giddy when he told me that another owner had offered us Troy Tulowitzki for Joakim Soria. I was actually off from the day job that day and had seen the announcement that Tulo was going to miss six to eight weeks after breaking his wrist the night before. A few hours later, Tulo’s owner posted on the messageboard that he was taking offers in an attempt to move the injured star for a discount.

How do you guys feel about owners trying to pull a fast one and dump guys right after they get hurt and when the ink announcing their imminent DL stint is still wet?

Personally, I can’t say that this practice is actually unethical because it is incumbent upon any actor in a trade to do his/her homework on all the players involved. The tried and true mantra of “buyer beware” is in full effect here and I respect the idea that all is fair in love and war. That said, I do think it’s kind of dirty, or classless, especially in a league of friends.

There are two slight variations of this situation though, one of which I think is fully above board and one I feel to be ethically unacceptable. So, I might as well discuss them as well.

Sometimes you have a player on your team who you know is dealing with lingering injuries and it’s basically just a matter of time before he goes on the DL. I have no problem with any owner shopping this player disclaimer free. A player is not considered broken until he’s broken. I don’t consider this even remotely unethical. Like the original scenario, you are attempting to capitalize a knowledge gap regarding a player’s health, but at this point it is entirely speculative.

There is a variation of this situation that I have seen happen that is unacceptable, though. If you have a live trade offer on your table and the player you are going to give up suffers a serious injury, you can’t pull the trigger on that trade within even 24 hours of the news of the injury becoming public. It is unfair to obligate an owner to have to cancel that trade within minutes of an injury occurring because this is not always possible. Surely, there does reach a point at which an owner must be accountable for his/her own negligence, but courtesy and fairness dictate to me that such a period mustn’t be any shorter than a full day at the absolute minimum.

Have any of you ever been burnt by another owner accepting a trade off minutes after an injury to ship you broken goods?


Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
eric kesselman
Guest
eric kesselman

Not disclosing a significant recent change in injury status is definitely unethical in my mind. It can be a bit tricky figuring out where the line is about what you have to disclose, but thats way over it.

Also, in both of these posts I’m a bit surprised at the number of comments that talk about whether its friends or not friends, an annual league, etc. These factors don’t really play into the morality of the situation. Figuring out how it helps or hurts you in the long run is generally not the approach to solving moral dilemmas.

Howard
Guest
Howard
If the question is ethics, this is clearly unethical.  You are knowingly trying to pull a fast one.  Usually if I get an offer that seems too good to be true I check it out.  If I had Soria & this was offered to me immediately after the injury (assuming nonkeeper league), I would not only reject it, but I would email all other owners or post on the message board what this owner tried to do. It’s things like this why leagues have trade review periods/commisioners/veto processes.  It ruins the integrity of the league to try and put a… Read more »
db
Guest
db

Many years ago I instantly accepted an offer of Marc McGwire for Frank Thomas that was offered to me immediately after a big injury to McGwire and before it was widely known.  The commish cancelled the trade, and the owner admitted he did it more as a joke and didn’t expect it to be accepted (not realizing that the injury was not disclosed in the player’s comments).  I think this was the right result.  If you disclose, obviously it is no issue.

Derek Ambrosino
Guest
Derek Ambrosino
Eric, Also, in both of these posts I’m a bit surprised at the number of comments that talk about whether its friends or not friends, an annual league, etc. These factors don’t really play into the morality of the situation. This could quickly and easily devolve into a discussion of philosophy and/or semantics, but suppose one leans toward meta-ethical relativism, circumstance, culture, and atmosphere would certainly be worthy of consideration. Anthropologically speaking, across various cultures there seem to be a number of principles that approach absolutism – unprovoked murder of fellow fellow clansmen, parents and children having sex with one… Read more »
Andrew
Guest
Andrew
Regarding the situation that you find acceptable, I’m glad you brought this up. I play in many leagues every year, but this is one rule that has to be in place in order for me to take part in a league. Personally, I think it should extend beyond injury, though. In deeper leagues where the waiver wire is practically empty, it’s not uncommon for players to be demoted to the Minors, sometimes even when a demotion could not have been foreseen. Accordingly, I’m of the opinion that anything that severely alters the stock of a player (injury, demotion, real-life trade)… Read more »
Andrew
Guest
Andrew

Whoops, meant to say the situation that you find UNacceptable

eric kesselman
Guest
eric kesselman

I really don’t think we need to go into philosophy, anthropology, or deeply into ethics just to note that most moral analysis we generally do doesn’t really start with ‘how does it help me?’ or ‘how well do i know the guy?’

That’s the only point I was making there.

Bob
Guest
Bob
This happened to me last year in a league I’ve been commissioner of for a long time with a guy I’ve been friends with for a long time.  Let me know if you guys think he pulled a fast one or not.  I made an offer to him for Coco Crisp (needed speed in a deep league) right after he suffered the injury.  I saw the video of him falling in the outfield with the seagulls all around.  I knew he was injured but the early reports were that he wasn’t injured that badly and he’d be back in action… Read more »
Steve
Guest
Steve
I think it depends on the type of league.  If you’re in a league with a bunch of friends like I am, then I would disclose, since these people ARE afterall your friends.  If it’s a league where you don’t know most of the people, then I say go for it.  See what you can get.  The other scenario where it might be ok, is in a keeper league with a team hopelessly out of it.  In our league there are already 3-4 teams that have no shot at “the money” (first 4 places).  Those teams might like a guy… Read more »
Derek Ambrosino
Guest
Derek Ambrosino
Bob, I’m inclined to agree with Josh. As long as the other owner knew that you knew Crisp was hurt, I think it’s unreasonable to then dissect that knowledge into, “well, how much did he exactly know about the injury.” Have you ever been in a conversation with somebody and had them ask if you have ever read a certain book, and you reply that you did when really you had only read a little bit of it, a review/summary, or heard an interview with its author? I’m sure most of us have been in some variation of a situation… Read more »
Derek Ambrosino
Guest
Derek Ambrosino
just to note that most moral analysis we generally do doesn’t really start with ‘how does it help me?’ or ‘how well do i know the guy?’ Well, my point is that’s a reductionist way to frame those questions. “How well do I know you the guy” is a way to reduce the idea of moral relativism. The question is really, what is the largely shared morality among this group within the context of the league? I’d be willing to bet that you allow “how well do I know this guy” to influence your opinions on what it “right” to… Read more »
Josh Shepardson
Guest
Josh Shepardson

Sorry Bob, but in your case, where you’d seen Crisp go down and suspected he was injured I think that’s a shame on you situation.  I would feel completely different if you hadn’t seen the play itself, and suspected injury as you described.

Nutlaw
Guest
Nutlaw

Uh yeah, okay, fine. Sometimes people knowingly agree to bad trades. However, if one GM attempts to disadvantage another GM in trade by withholding information, it is immoral. Whether that immoral behavior is accepted within the group is another matter, but it’s pretty fair to say that attempting to cheat or swindle other people is widely recognized as immoral behavior in most situations.

injunsteve
Guest
injunsteve
In July of the 2007 season in my Dynasty League the ABombs offered his Dan Haren to Los Chupacabras for Hanley Ramirez.  This seemed like a fair trade at the time it was offered.  Hanley was coming off of an impressive rookie year, but Hareen seemed more proven.  Within hours of the trade offer Hanley suffered a shoulder injury.  Los Chupacabras accepted the offer when he found out about the news.  There was an uproar in the league, but in the end we have a no trade veto policy.  The shoulder injury wound up only keeping HanRam out for 4… Read more »
Bob
Guest
Bob

You see, I’m coming from the perspective that Nutlaw more astutely expressed.  If I had known Crisp was being re-examined and sent for an MRI, I probably wouldn’t do the deal and I definitely wouldn’t have increased my offer.  In the play I saw, Crisp fell backward on his ass.  How do you end up with a shoulder injury doing that?  My trading partner withheld vital information that gave him an advantage in the deal.

Jason B
Guest
Jason B

“I’ve seen trades go through that I wouldn’t have even had the gaul to propose.”

Candidly, I don’t think anyone has Gaul anymore.  The French and Belgians kind of divvied up the remains.

You, however, may have been lacking in *gall*.

Brad Johnson
Guest
Brad Johnson

This is simple, always do a news search on google (sorted by post time) before doing a trade, just to be extra sure.

Derek Ambrosino
Guest
Derek Ambrosino
Touche, Jason B. I have a personal policy regarding my THT writing and my day job, which is basically that I don’t mind taking some time away from my busy day job to respond to comments, but unless its uncharacteristically slow, I forego the proofreading as a way to cap my insubordination. Nutlaw, If one GM attempts to disadvantage another GM in trade by withholding information, it is immoral Where do we draw the line? Must I tell my prospective partner – hey, buy if you want, but you should know that you’re getting a guy who has an unsustainable… Read more »
wpDiscuz