The Trial of Alex R.

Let’s dispense with the death by a thousand sportswriter cuts business and get right down to indicting A-Rod’s butt:

Would the Reprobate, Alex R., please rise?

Alex R., The Pontificate accuses, convicts, and sentences you for the following High Crimes:

High Crime Count 1: You, the Greatest Player in the Game, took illegal steroids six years ago. Even though the Game didn’t enforce a prohibition against said substances at the time, the Tribunal, nonethless, finds you guilty of cheating. Your offense against the spirit of sportsmanship, furthermore, deserves more draconian punishment than all the other forms of cheating the Game excused, overlooked, and/or condoned over the last century– to wit, throwing spit balls, doctoring its seams, corking bats, stealing signs, using pinetar, ingesting “greenies” or snorting cocaine– because the Pontificate says so.

High Crime– Count 2: You, the Current Active Homerun Leader, have desecrated the holy numbers 714, 755, and *61 and profaned the myth of the eternal, age-independent homerun. (The Pontificate guards these numbers’ sanctity notwithstanding the dramatic reduction in ballparks’ dimensions over the last two decades or the profound changes the games has undergone since We canonized them. )

And it gets better from there. This is Saturday must-reading from The Yankees’ Republic.


Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Wooden U Lykteneau
Guest
Wooden U Lykteneau

Are you sure you couldn’t find anything more pretentious?

Andy Stankiweicz
Guest
Andy Stankiweicz

Dude, it’s satire. 

Ever read a legal brief? 

I got sued years ago and that’s how lawyers write, man.  They’re worse than academics.

Jack Marshall
Guest
Jack Marshall

Except that in “The Trial,” Josef K. did nothing wrong. Is that really your position on Alex, Craig? That he’s the victim of a faceless bureaucracy, persecuting him for the crime of his own existance? I’m sure somewhere there’s a worse candidate for martyrdom than A-Rod, but I can’t think of one at the moment.

Craig Calcaterra
Guest
Craig Calcaterra

Actually, Jack, I just thought it was funny and pointed out some common hypocrisy on the subject in a satirical fashion.

But I have to ask: surely you’re not taking the position that anyone who fails to condemn Alex Rodriguez as the monster you seem to think him to be considers him a martyr who did nothing wrong, are you?

Jack Marshall
Guest
Jack Marshall

Now, Craig—-be fair. When did I say Alex was a monster? (That’s another Kafka story altogether.)

No, I really think “The Trial” is inapt. Good satire matches the vehicle with its target. And matching him with Josef K. does represent A-Rod as a martyr.

That certainly doesn’t mean you can’t think it’s funny.

wpDiscuz