A baseball card mystery: Lou Brock and the unknown Pirate

I hear a lot of talk about how Lou Brock doesn’t deserve to be in the Hall of Fame. The critics say that he didn’t walk enough. That he struck out too much. That he wasn’t a good enough defender in left field. Those critics say that those weaknesses counteract the 3,023 hits and the 938 stolen bases.

Many of those critics conveniently ignore Brock’s postseason numbers, which I believe carry him from a borderline Hall of Famer into a deserving place in Cooperstown. Brock played in three World Series for the Cardinals, all during the pitcher’s era of the 1960s. His performance in those three Fall Classics amounted to a cross of Ty Cobb and Lou Gehrig. Brock batted a combined .391 in 21 games, covering a span of 92 plate appearances. He hit four home runs, stole 14 bases in 16 tries, and compiled an OPS of over 1.000.

Without Brock’s all-world effort, it’s quite likely that the Cardinals don’t win two of those World Series, in 1964 against the Yankees and in 1967 against the Red Sox. It’s true that Brock did make a baserunning mistake in his third Series against the Tigers, when he failed to slide into home against Bill Freehan in Game Five, but it’s worth pointing out that the Cardinals still led the game at that point. It’s also pertinent to note that Brock hit .464 in that Series and reached base over 51 per cent of the time. It would be difficult to pin the seven-game loss squarely on the shoulders of Brock.

Having established my brief but emphatic case for Brock, his 1976 card is easily my favorite among those issued for him by Topps. It’s most appropriate that Topps shows him on the basepaths, where he gained much of his reputation as the game’s new stolen base king after Cobb.

image

Brock’s card shows him taking a lead off the second base bag in a game that appears to have taken place at Pittsburgh’s Three Rivers Stadium. Ordinarily, I would say that the photograph was taken during the preceding season, in 1975. But in checking the Pirates’ roster from that season, I cannot find a black infielder who featured a “2” in his uniform number. In looking at a roster from Baseball Almanac, Craig Reynolds wore the No. 12, but the Pirates’ infielder in this photo is clearly not Reynolds. Of that, I am certain!
`
Based on the angle of the photograph, I’m relatively sure that the Pirates infielder is the shortstop and not the second baseman. So my initial thoughts centered on Frank Taveras. But he wore No. 10, and not 12 in 1975. I also don’t remember Taveras having such a large Afro as the player in this picture, but my memory could be sketchy on that point.

Maybe we need to go back a season further, to 1974. But Taveras still wore No. 10, and the only two Pirates infielders to have a “2” in their number were Ed Kirkpatrick (No. 23) and Paul Popovich (No. 24). Both were white, so there is no match there either.

To be honest, I’m positively stumped on this one. Without knowing the identity of the Pirates’ infielder, there is probably no way to pinpoint the date, the game, and the inning. Can anyone help me out on these persisting questions?


Print This Post
Bruce Markusen is the manager of Digital and Outreach Learning at the National Baseball Hall of Fame. He has authored seven baseball books, including biographies of Roberto Clemente, Orlando Cepeda and Ted Williams, and A Baseball Dynasty: Charlie Finley’s Swingin’ A’s, which was awarded SABR's Seymour Medal.

Leave a Reply

35 Comments on "A baseball card mystery: Lou Brock and the unknown Pirate"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Will
Guest
Will
I’m not so sure that’s the shortstop.  If the photographer was in the dugout, and if Brock was on first, the angle could be showing the second baseman.  Also, look at Brock’s lead-His foot is on the cusp of the dirt.  Most runners, when they lead off of second base are further out towards the outfield to get a better angle rounding third base.  This implies to me that he is leading off of first base, not second base. As far as the identity, I have no clue, but I do think that the search should be around Pirates second… Read more »
Doug Overton
Guest
Doug Overton

Initially, I just said, “It’s Frank Tavares”.  Then after reading some comments, Jackie Hernandez made the most sense.  However, I never remembered him having an afro hair style.  He always seemed to have his hair cut pretty close.  The only evidence I found is his 1974 Topps card.  He does indeed have the mid 70s afro coming out from his hat.  Jackie Hernandez – 1973.  I’ll leave it to those sleuths who can track down which year and game, but it seems it is 1973 because this was Hernandez last season.

john w
Guest
john w

it appears judging by the placement of the number 2,it is either a number that ends in 2 or simply the number 2.so means it could be Jackie hernandez from 1973.check it out on baseball almanac,has listing of every pirate team roster.

Jim G.
Guest
Jim G.
I was all set to accept that it was Jackie Hernandez from a previous season (I even pinned down the date in ‘73 that it could’ve been), but as 87 Cards notes, there are NO available shots of Hernandez with an afro. (He has had a very small mustache, but nothing like in this card. It certainly wasn’t Mendoza. He wore 11 with the Pirates, was a little stockier build, and had no ability to grow significant facial hair. (There is evidence to pathetic attempts.) So, everything points to Frank Taveras, who it totally looks like, but why is he… Read more »
Chuck De Vries
Guest
Chuck De Vries

Ah, what makes you think he’s black?

Dennis Bedard
Guest
Dennis Bedard

When I first read this, the name Rennie Stennet jumped out at me but he wore number 6 I believe.

Jim G.
Guest
Jim G.
Aha! http://www.ebay.com/itm/1973-Pittsburgh-Pirates-team-photo-bw957-/251044433829 This team photo from 1973 shows Hernandez with similar afro and facial hair. Close enough to compare to the card. (He’s back row, far left.) So if we go to 1973, there were 4 games hosting the Cardinals that Hernandez played short and Brock was on 2nd. A double header on Sept. 3rd, Sept. 4th and Sept. 5th. The card clearly looks like a day game. The 4th and 5th had 8pm-ish starts, so I eliminate them. That leaves the double header on the 3rd. I was thinking day/night, but game 1 started at 10:38 AM!! (Imagine that!)… Read more »
Jim
Guest
Jim

I must agree with Jim G.  However, the inning Brock went to second on a throw was the 6th.  If it is the second game, then in Three Rivers Stadium, 1st base must have been west of second base.  I don’t know, never was there.

Bruce Markusen
Guest
Bruce Markusen

Good work, everyone. I agree that it is Jackie Hernandez and likely from that 1973 season.

Hernandez was much criticized in his day, but he was good enough to be the starting shortstop for a world championship team in 1971.

87 Cards
Guest
87 Cards

To Jim G @ 1:36 pm:

Mario Mendoza’s mustache attempts add a new dimension to the “Mendoza Line.”

bstar
Guest
bstar

I can’t explain the uniform number, but the face is almost indisputably Frank Taveras. Look at his 1975 Topps card: the afro, the ‘stache, the slightly sunken cheek bones, the light-toned skin. It’s gotta be him.

http://75topps.blogspot.com/2010/08/277-frank-taveras.html

Bill Ogorodny
Guest
Bill Ogorodny

I think the number 2 may be Mario Mendozza. I don’t recall what number he wore when he came up with the Bucs but the face sure looks like Mendozza.

Bill Ogorodny
Guest
Bill Ogorodny

A second guess would be that it is Jackie Hernandez.  He did wear number 2 and played for the Pirates in the 1974 season.

bstar
Guest
bstar

After looking at Jackie Hernandez’s 1974 card, it could just as easily be him and since he did wear #2 in 1973 I rescind my previous comment that it was Taveras.

Here’s Hernandez’s 1974 card:

http://marketplace.beckett.com/sandccollectibles_1085/item/1974-topps-566-jackie-hernandez_73261841

Kent Ritchie
Guest
Kent Ritchie

I, too would say that it is jackie Hernandez. Picture could be a couple of years old.

87 Cards
Guest
87 Cards

Quite a headscratcher….I offer this for the HBT community to chew on.

The face and ‘fro look a young Frank Tavares—google the ‘75 Frank Tavares Topps card and evaluate.

However, I find no documentary proof that Tavares wore number 2 or x2 ever.

Three Rivers Stadium opened for baseball on July 16, 1970.  From that date to 1975, the only Pirate shortstop that wore #2 or #x2 was Jackie Hernandez from 1971 to 1973. The Internet records no images of Hernandez with a ‘fro or even facial hair.

Bruce, I give up on this one—good challenge; thanks for keeping them coming.

scott
Guest
scott

If Brock doesn’t deserve to be in the HOF simply because of a base-running mistake in the World Series, then the same goes for Babe Ruth!  Brock is a HOFer all the way.

Michael Caragliano
Guest
Michael Caragliano
Here’s a possibility—is this a photo from 1973? If so, then the fielder is Jackie Hernandez. If you look closely, there’s something like a shadow on the fielder’s left shoulder which could be the #21 patch the Pirates wore for Roberto Clemente. Hernandez clearly has a ‘stache and a ‘fro on his 1974 Topps card, which has a photo of him from 1973. He wore #2 his entire tenure with the Pirates. Plus, Topps using photos more than two years old isn’t unprecedented; there are a couple of Mets photos in the 1969 set that were clearly taken in 1964… Read more »
Peter Boucher
Guest
Peter Boucher

The trouble is, the Pirates player most certainly has a No.2 on his jersey but Brock’s left arm is in the way of what could possibly be a number to the left of the number 2. 12, 22, 32, 42, who knows ??

jere
Guest
jere
It’s Jackie Hernandez (game is from ‘73 because of Robinson patch and nobody else fits whose number ended with 2). And Jim G. has it all right in terms of the date, Sept. 3. And game one of that DH is indeed eliminated since the shadows compare with other photos of post-noontime at Three Rivers. (North ran from first to home.) So it is game 2, and you can tell Brock JUST slid—look at the dirt on his right leg/foot. I think this pic from Getty Images might even be that very steal, 5th inning, game 2, 9/3/1973, everything matches… Read more »
Jim G.
Guest
Jim G.

@Jim – Thank for the clarification. It was the 6th.
@ Jere – the steal was in the 4th inning
@ 87 Cards Re: Mendoza Line – good one!
@ bstar – I sympathize with you. I was sure it was Taveras for a while myself.

Forsch31
Guest
Forsch31

Here’s a better image of Jackie Hernandez’s Topps card from 1974 that bstar posted: http://baseballsimulator.com/baseballcards/front.php?id2=12363 It’s most definitely him.

Jim
Guest
Jim

Why did Topps use a three year old picture on a future Hall of Famer card?  I would think that would be restricted to “cup of coffee” players.

Jere
Guest
Jere

Hey it’s just like how even Superman can’t win at Scrabble if he’s picking vowels all day. If you couldn’t get a good shot of the guy, you had to hit the vault I guess.

bstar
Guest
bstar

Good stuff on the photo find, Jere. We can even match up the stocking length on Hernandez’s legs & the length of the undershirt both are wearing from your pic.

Mark Marvelli
Guest
Mark Marvelli

It’s rookie Willie Randolph (12), playing second base, photographed from the first base dugout photographers area. It doesnt look like what we think of as WR but he played 30 games that year as a fresh faced, big haired, mustachioed 21 year old for the Pirates.

Mark Marvelli
Guest
Mark Marvelli

Just to clarify…in ‘75 Craig Reynolds wore 12 for for 31 games while playing shortstop at the beginning of the season. Randolph came up at the end of July and took over the uniform number after Reynolds was gone and played mostly second base with a game or two at third.

Jim G.
Guest
Jim G.

OK, let’s ignore the fact that Randolph is much darker skinned and never had more than a thin mustache (and there’s no pictures of him in a PP uniform with any stache). Randolph played in two games at home vs. the Cards in ‘75, and was a pinch hitter both times. He never played the field in those games. There’s no way that’s Randolph.

Bruce Markusen
Guest
Bruce Markusen

There are few things I’m sure of in life, but one of them is this: That is NOT Willie Randolph on Lou Brock’s card.

jere
Guest
jere

Here’s what Willie looked like that year—notice he’s not wearing #12 either: http://i15.ebayimg.com/01/i/001/1b/72/0d7e_12.GIF

DEoA
Guest
DEoA

You know why I bet they used an old picture of Lou Brock for 1976? Because none of Lou’s base cards from 1962 (his rookie card) to 1975 are action shots. They are merely poses, usually holding a bat. I wonder if someone at Topps realized they had never had a card of Lou in action in all their years.

Jim
Guest
Jim

Whoever that Pirate is, he has a patch on his left sleeve.  They (the Pirates) only did that in 1973 and is was a 21 inside a circle for Clemente.  So, it’s got to be a 73 picture.

Leo
Guest
Leo

Howdy, i read your blog from time to time and i own a
similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam responses?
If so how do you protect against it, any plugin or anything you can suggest?
I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any support is very much appreciated.

Leo
Guest
Leo

Howdy, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam responses?
If so how do you protect against it, any plugin or anything you can suggest?

I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any support is very much appreciated.

Dan Holmes
Guest

The black arm band on Hernandez’s left sleeve was only worn by the Pirates in 1973, the year after Clemente was killed.

wpDiscuz