It will be “The Galarraga Game”

Rotten as the bizarre finish to Armando Galarraga’s imperfect game was, there is this to consider: by not being credited with a perfect game, Galarraga will very likely be better remembered decades from now than if that play had been (correctly) called as out.

The best historical comparable to this circumstance is that of Harvey Haddix, and his celebrated non-achievement of May 26, 1959, a game which has ever since been familiar to nearly every serious fan as, simply, “The Harvey Haddix Game.” That game and that pitcher gained far more permanent prominence because of the heartbreaking outcome than if it had been a successfully completed, actual, garden variety perfect game.

So though it’s no doubt cold comfort to him, Armando Galarraga, an otherwise forgettable journeyman pitcher, will almost certainly find his name being uttered by fans a very long time from now, as they shake their heads over the amazing “Armando Galarraga Game.” He will be known forever to a degree that, say, Dallas Braden won’t.


Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
InnocentBystander
Guest
InnocentBystander

I like your take on this and hope you’re right. I think that legacy has the best chance if this spurs MLB to move forward with instant review.

Steve Treder
Guest
Steve Treder

Let’s hope so!

Devon Young
Guest
Devon Young

Very true.

(Note: It’s very irritating hearing people call this an “imperfect game” or “near perfect game”, when everybody saw it was perfect.)

Steve Brosemer
Guest
Steve Brosemer

Excellent point about Harvey Haddix, although it is not quite an “apples to apples” analogy, but close enough for a point well taken.  I had the 1960 statistics Strat-o-matic game. Me and my dice always rooted for the Pirates, partially because of that game that made quite an impression on me back then. wink

Jim C
Guest
Jim C
I disagree somewhat. If the Pirates had scored in the top of the 12th, and Haddix had finished with a 12-inning perfect game win, everyone would look at that game now as the best game ever pitched, with virtually no argument. The fact that he lost the perfect game, the no-hitter, the shutout, and the game in a matter of moments makes it sad, and somewhat lessens the accomplishment, but adds to the story. For Galarraga, this will probably be his career high point, and it’s a shame he lost it due to umpire incomptence. The only good that can… Read more »
Bob Sanchez
Guest
Bob Sanchez

How many people are still talking about Milt Pappas?  This only remains in history if it finally pushes MLB over the brink toward instant replay.

Steve Treder
Guest
Steve Treder
Well, Milt Pappas is still talking about Milt Pappas, but then he never stopped.  Point taken, but I think there’s a meaningful difference between the situations.  For one thing, a ball/strike call is just a different thing than a blown first base putout call, particularly one that (with the benefit of replay) wasn’t even all that close. Second, Pappas was already a well-known player before his not-quite-perfecto; he’d been in the majors for 15 years, had been an All-Star, and had been infamously traded for Frank Robinson.  Pappas is fairly well remembered today for the totality of his substantial career;… Read more »
Matthew Desmond
Guest
Matthew Desmond
I dunno. It’s different, now. Full disclosure: I’m a Tigers fan. (I didn’t watch that game, or I wouldn’t be writing this, since I’d have jumped off my fire escape.) But it’s really been something to see, the way this thing has seized people’s imagination. It’s got this whole Greek Tragedy thing going for it; it’s really compelling. There aren’t even any villains—that poor stupid bastard blew the call, but it DESTROYED him. He was a complete emotional wreck within minutes. How’s he ever going to be the same? And Galarraga with his weird little smile; it’s already the stuff… Read more »
Steve Brosemer
Guest
Steve Brosemer

Should be known as the 28 Out Perfect Game.  Selig should give the umpire mental closure by doing what’s right by Galarraga.

brad
Guest
brad

the first baseman nwas bobbling th ball as the runner touched first. safe by a mile…after all that sucking up the ump was right as he called it he knew it!

Jeff
Guest
Jeff

The 28 by 58

Andrew Lavigne
Guest
Andrew Lavigne

Why (apart from tradition,aka bullshit) doesn’t MLB change the call? There’s no question that it was a perfect game, it’s all on video tape. The way the Ump’s throat constricted and the way his tongue and lips moved and the resulting sound are the only thing that change it.

Jim C
Guest
Jim C

Get a clue Brad. First, it wasn’t the first baseman on the bag, it was the pitcher. Second, the ball was in his glove the whole time. Have you actually watched the replay, or were you looking at a different game?

Jay Gloab
Guest
Jay Gloab

I don’t think it would change how well this game is remembered if Selig decided to reverse the call and award Galarraga a perfect game.

wpDiscuz