Josh Beckett’s Colorful 2009 Season

Hi there. Here’s a visual portrait (both figuratively and literally) of Josh Beckett’s 2009 season. Sort of a blend of pop art and the baseball box score.

Some notes (for those curious):

First, I’m using red to indicate a quality start (min 6 IP, 3 ER or less). Sometimes I wonder about the notion of a “quality start,” though. I think I’m more impressed by an 8 inning 4 ER start than a 6 inning 3 ER start. Second, for partial innings completed I rounded down (just to keep the graphic simple).

image


Print This Post
Kevin Dame is a writer and visual designer who brings sports information to life in new and meaningful ways. Visit his website and follow him on Twitter @kevintdame.
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
kds
Guest
kds

How about using a whole palette of colors, tied to Bill James’ Game Scores?  Then you could use size, shape, etc., to show other things; e.g., IP, Wins, Innings, Runs, etc.

David
Guest
David

I really enjoy your visuals, great creative work here. Out of curiosity, how long did it take to create this one in particular?

Jim
Guest
Jim

I love this; it is my wallpaper now.

Thank you.

zach
Guest
zach

Can you check out the difference of his stuff in quality starts vs. a poor start?

King Kaufman
Guest
King Kaufman

My definition of a quality start is at least 5 innings with an ERA of 4.50 or below. 8 innings, 4 ER is definitely better than 6 innings, 3 ER. I’ll also take 5IP and 2 ER.

You mean to tell me that once a guy has 5 IP and 2 ER, what he has to do to earn a quality start is go out and pitch an inning with an ERA of 9.00?

Todd
Guest
Todd

I agree with King Kaufman. Even if you want to make the cutoff 6 IP, having a max ERA, rather then simple max ER, makes far more sense. After all, what about 4 ER/9 IP?

Kevin, I realize that your goal here is to present interesting visuals, and that you’re not trying to innovate on the statistical side of things, so that’s not meant as a criticism, just as a comment. I like this presentation, though I would agree with the idea that a gradient of some sort could improve it.

Joe
Guest
Joe

This is a really great visual!  I totally agree with you on the quality start issue.  Then again, quality is definitely an “eye-of-the-beholder” kind of thing…even when it has been officially defined.

Kevin Dame
Guest
Kevin Dame

Thanks everyone for the comments and suggestions.  Very helpful.

David, to answer your question, it can take anywhere from 5-10 hours to create a visual, depending on the complexity and how much experimenting I do.

wpDiscuz