Nate Cornejo
Birthdate: 9/24/1979 Bats/Throws: R/R Height/Weight: 6-5/245 Position: P Contract: Add New Contract
|
|
|
|
|
| 2001 | Tigers | 4 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 42.2 | 4.64 | 5.91 | 2.11 | .344 | 70.0 % | | | 7.38 | 7.24 | | -0.7 |
| 2002 | Tigers | 1 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 4.14 | 3.24 | 1.08 | .315 | 67.0 % | 55.4 % | 13.0 % | 5.04 | 4.80 | 4.52 | 0.3 |
| 2003 | Tigers | 6 | 17 | 0 | 32 | 32 | 194.2 | 2.13 | 2.68 | 0.83 | .304 | 68.4 % | 50.6 % | 8.6 % | 4.67 | 4.70 | 5.06 | 1.6 |
| 2004 | Tigers | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 25.2 | 4.21 | 3.86 | 1.40 | .392 | 59.9 % | 54.2 % | 13.8 % | 8.42 | 5.54 | 5.12 | 0.0 |
| 2006 | White Sox (AA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.0 | 3.60 | 3.60 | 0.00 | .333 | 75.0 % | | | 3.60 | 3.60 | | |
| 2006 | White Sox (AAA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3.1 | 8.10 | 8.10 | 0.00 | .556 | 38.5 % | | | 16.20 | 4.10 | | |
| Total | - - - | 12 | 29 | 0 | 56 | 56 | 313.0 | 2.96 | 3.31 | 1.09 | .319 | 67.6 % | 51.8 % | 9.9 % | 5.41 | 5.13 | 4.97 | 1.1 |
| 2001 | Tigers | 4.64 | 5.91 | 0.79 | 2.11 | 10.1 % | 12.9 % | .339 | 2.13 | .344 | 70.0 % | 171 | 169 | 7.24 |
| 2001 | Average | 6.74 | 3.29 | 2.05 | 1.13 | 17.3 % | 8.5 % | .259 | 1.38 | .292 | 71.2 % | | | 4.57 |
| 2002 | Tigers | 4.14 | 3.24 | 1.28 | 1.08 | 10.0 % | 7.8 % | .300 | 1.62 | .315 | 67.0 % | 117 | 114 | 4.80 |
| 2002 | Average | 6.53 | 3.38 | 1.93 | 1.05 | 16.8 % | 8.7 % | .257 | 1.38 | .289 | 71.7 % | | | 4.52 |
| 2003 | Tigers | 2.13 | 2.68 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 5.5 % | 6.9 % | .302 | 1.51 | .304 | 68.4 % | 107 | 109 | 4.70 |
| 2003 | Average | 6.40 | 3.30 | 1.94 | 1.08 | 16.4 % | 8.5 % | .260 | 1.38 | .291 | 71.2 % | | | 4.57 |
| 2004 | Tigers | 4.21 | 3.86 | 1.09 | 1.40 | 9.6 % | 8.8 % | .372 | 2.06 | .392 | 59.9 % | 188 | 126 | 5.54 |
| 2004 | Average | 6.60 | 3.36 | 1.96 | 1.13 | 16.9 % | 8.6 % | .261 | 1.40 | .293 | 71.4 % | | | 4.62 |
| 2006 | White Sox (AA) | 3.60 | 3.60 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 9.1 % | 9.1 % | .300 | 1.60 | .333 | 75.0 % | | | 3.60 |
| 2006 | White Sox (AAA) | 8.10 | 8.10 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 12.5 % | 12.5 % | .476 | 3.90 | .556 | 38.5 % | | | 4.10 |
| Total | - - - | 2.96 | 3.31 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 7.3 % | 8.1 % | .313 | 1.66 | .319 | 67.6 % | 124 | 119 | 5.13 |
| 2002 | Tigers | 2.24 | 19.9 % | 55.4 % | 24.7 % | 4.3 % | 13.0 % | 9.7 % | 100.0 % | 5.19 | 4.56 | 103 | 4.52 |
| 2003 | Tigers | 1.73 | 20.3 % | 50.6 % | 29.2 % | 7.7 % | 8.6 % | 5.8 % | 21.1 % | 5.17 | 5.40 | 113 | 5.06 |
| 2004 | Tigers | 1.79 | 15.6 % | 54.2 % | 30.2 % | 6.9 % | 13.8 % | 7.7 % | 60.0 % | 5.13 | 5.14 | 113 | 5.12 |
| Total | - - - | 1.82 | 19.7 % | 51.8 % | 28.5 % | 7.0 % | 9.9 % | 6.8 % | 32.0 % | 5.17 | 5.21 | 111 | 4.97 |
| 2001 | Tigers | -1.05 | -4.74 | 3.69 | -16.61 | -1.52 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 1.07 | 10 | -1.78 | 0.75 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | Tigers | -1.37 | -5.73 | 4.35 | -8.96 | -0.88 | 1.18 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 1.27 | 8 | -0.75 | -0.42 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | Tigers | -0.38 | -16.81 | 16.43 | -9.55 | -0.94 | 1.09 | 0.98 | 0.87 | 1.34 | 30 | -0.78 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | Tigers | -0.68 | -2.24 | 1.56 | -10.24 | -0.98 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 5 | -0.89 | -0.03 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | - - - | -3.48 | -29.52 | 26.04 | -45.37 | -4.32 | 1.06 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 1.19 | 53 | -4.20 | 0.92 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | Tigers | 78.2% (89.2) | 9.9% (83.5) | | 5.9% (78.0) | 5.9% (83.3) | | | 11.6% |
| 2003 | Tigers | 73.0% (87.5) | 12.8% (82.9) | | 3.1% (79.6) | 11.0% (81.5) | 0.1% (85.3) | | 6.4% |
| 2004 | Tigers | 59.1% (84.8) | 17.5% (80.9) | | 3.5% (78.6) | 19.9% (80.5) | | | 0.9% |
| Total | - - - | 72.4% (87.6) | 12.8% (82.7) | | 3.7% (78.9) | 11.1% (81.5) | 0.1% (85.3) | | 6.8% |
| 2002 | Tigers | -5.1 | -2.1 | | -3.4 | 0.9 | | | -0.90 | -2.89 | | -7.99 | 2.09 | | |
| 2003 | Tigers | 0.5 | -5.9 | | 0.5 | -5.0 | -0.4 | | 0.03 | -1.65 | | 0.62 | -1.63 | -12.23 | |
| 2004 | Tigers | -3.3 | -5.2 | | 0.9 | -2.8 | | | -1.22 | -6.54 | | 5.63 | -3.14 | | |
| Total | - - - | -7.8 | -13.2 | | -2.0 | -6.9 | -0.4 | | -0.27 | -2.58 | | -1.38 | -1.58 | -12.23 | |
| 2002 | Tigers | 17.4 % | 69.8 % | 44.8 % | 69.1 % | 88.3 % | 84.8 % | 52.4 % | 59.1 % | 6.7 % |
| 2002 | Average | 18.1 % | 70.1 % | 46.5 % | 47.5 % | 85.5 % | 78.8 % | 54.6 % | 58.3 % | 9.8 % |
| 2003 | Tigers | 15.2 % | 65.9 % | 42.3 % | 70.0 % | 94.8 % | 90.7 % | 53.5 % | 60.2 % | 4.0 % |
| 2003 | Average | 22.2 % | 68.8 % | 46.2 % | 51.9 % | 87.8 % | 79.4 % | 51.4 % | 58.6 % | 9.5 % |
| 2004 | Tigers | 11.6 % | 69.7 % | 41.8 % | 60.0 % | 90.2 % | 86.2 % | 52.0 % | 56.0 % | 5.9 % |
| 2004 | Average | 16.6 % | 69.6 % | 45.8 % | 53.7 % | 85.2 % | 80.1 % | 55.1 % | 58.4 % | 9.0 % |
| Total | - - - | 15.3 % | 67.1 % | 42.8 % | 69.0 % | 93.0 % | 89.0 % | 53.1 % | 59.6 % | 4.7 % |