## Sample Size

So we have all of these statistics, but when can we use them?  Suppose a player goes three for three in their first game in the big leagues.  Should we expect this player to continue batting 1.000 for the rest of the season?  Of course not, that’d be silly.  Three at-bats is way too small a sample to draw conclusions about a player, but then we’re left with the question: at what point do statistics become reliable?

There has been a lot of research done in this area by Russell Carleton (AKA: the artist formerly known as Pizza Cutter). For his most recent work, you can find his full research at Baseball Prospectus. We’ve included links and a summary below:

Stabilization Points for Offense Statistics:

• 60 PA: Strikeout rate
• 120 PA: Walk rate
• 240 PA: HBP rate
• 290 PA: Single rate
• 1610 PA: XBH rate
• 170 PA: HR rate
• 910 AB: AVG
• 460 PA: OBP
• 320 AB: SLG
• 160 AB: ISO
• 80 BIP: GB rate
• 80 BIP: FB rate
• 600 BIP: LD rate
• 50 FBs: HR per FB
• 820 BIP: BABIP

Stabilization Points for Pitching Statistics:

• 70 BF: Strikeout rate
• 170 BF: Walk rate
• 640 BF: HBP rate
• 670 BF: Single rate
• 1450 BF: XBH rate
• 1320 BF: HR rate
• 630 BF: AVG
• 540 BF: OBP
• 550 AB: SLG
• 630 AB: ISO
• 70 BIP: GB rate
• 70 BIP: FB rate
• 650 BIP: LD rate
• 400 FB: HR per FB
• 2000 BIP: BABIP

In case it’s not obvious, you can tell a lot more about a hitter from one year of data than you can about a pitcher. If a statistic is not included, the means it did not stabilize over the intervals that Russell Carleton tested.

Also, a quote worth remembering: “In small sample sizes, a good scout is ALWAYS better than stats.”

Former Research:

525,600 Minutes: How Do You Measure a Player in a Year? – Statistically Speaking / Pizza Cutter

On the Reliability of Pitching Stats – Statistically Speaking / Pizza Cutter

When Samples Become Reliable – FanGraphs